choices
Lane Haygood · 05 Aug 2011, 16:20
· from 2011-August.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: lhaygood at gmail.com (Lane Haygood) Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 11:20:10 -0500 Subject: (urth) choices In-Reply-To: <CAJ8=rtimHzf9Kh+gvch6Xq4yLUdjGxiMXV3xOnYvvS16UjZQyQ at mail.gmail.com> References: <4E3B08D2.1040504 at irit.fr> <4E3B18A8.1090808 at gmail.com> <92DD8E0F9B754CC680D8A8E1BA5B7E46@jill> <4E3C0CB0.7090300 at gmail.com> <7BB818598EEA466587192D1C0DE05A64@jill> <CAJ8=rtimHzf9Kh+gvch6Xq4yLUdjGxiMXV3xOnYvvS16UjZQyQ at mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <CAFjGSafC_prjiR6K4Dgak1Ksvhg9GhOrdYJxj-R=FNd5q3ZxDQ at mail.gmail.com> Looking back at my choices, I have discovered an interesting fact about my moral philosophy. I am ready to absolve cosmic entities of moral guilt/evil because they transcend human experience. For instance, I'm not sure I considered the Hieros villanous even though they do some pretty beastly stuff to Severian and later Urth. The human-constrained notions of morality simply stop to apply once the scale gets big enough. On the other hand, a limited human that nevertheless acts with needless or irrational cruelty, or supreme dishonesty, always get my moral censure. Typhon or the Lannister family (sorry, I just read the new ASOIAF novel and it's fresh in my mind how much I hate this one family) are petty pushers of maliciousness when compared to someone that will drown a whole world with a white hole to throw in the middle of a dying sun, but I think they're worse for that. They'll fiddle while Rome burns, and that's less excusable than being the Ostrogoth with the torch. But I have less sympathy for a human that willingly chooses subservience to a cosmic evil, like the Consult/Mangaecca in Bakker's "Prince of Nothing" trilogy. Not that Kellhus is necessarily any better, because he just wants to control everyone and everything to settle up some serious daddy issues, but at least he's directing his psychosis in the right direction. LH On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes <danldo at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Gerry Quinn <gerry at bindweed.com> wrote: > >> My favourite villian is Casmir in Jack Vance's _Lyonesse_, but he doesn't >> really rejoice in his villainy, and would probably find arguments to justify >> all his actions. > > Ooooh. Vance's "Demon Princes" are classic villains. > > -- > Dan'l Danehy-Oakes > _______________________________________________ > Urth Mailing List > To post, write urth at urth.net > Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net >
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net