Silk's origin
Gerry Quinn · 12 Oct 2011, 14:53
· from 2011-October.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: gerry at bindweed.com (Gerry Quinn) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:53:46 +0100 Subject: (urth) Silk's origin In-Reply-To: <4E95A772.50808 at verizon.net> References: <CAM3O41KTbA6w=DGP0=PKOWeYCJqCnnzQHpMmR2DQn=qn9H8dRA at mail.gmail.com><4E9373A2.1050707 at gmail.com><4E939403.8080007 at verizon.net><4E93B5F8.3020306 at gmail.com><4E94487E.10501 at verizon.net><D68FAB30D7F440BB9095BD357CAB55A4@Rover><4E945874.9090301 at gmail.com><4E945C2F.7080905 at verizon.net> <4E948295.5010500 at gmail.com><571E68DA15DD499F97AF81E00288D79F@Rover> <4E95A772.50808 at verizon.net> Message-ID: <606577368B424519B0072050D478DF88@Rover> From: David Stockhoff On 10/12/2011 9:16 AM, Gerry Quinn wrote: > > I?m comfortable with the concept that the relationships are simply > > those described in the book: > > 1. Silk was grown from an engineered embryo bought by Tussah. His > > genetic parents on Urth have no significance to the story. Silk?s > > scanned persona later merged with the remains of that of Typhon. > > 2. Inhumi are animals, and have no relation to vines. [It may of > > course be that particular plants of Green are of some nutritional > > significance to the water-breathing juvenile form of the inhumi.] > Is it possible that Typhonic genes were inserted into embryos? Silk may > then get some parts of Typhon's genotype but not others. So with Mucor. > None would look like him. If Silk has genes for leadership, they may well be the same as Typhon?s. The same applies to blond hair, height (if they are of the same height) etc. I don?t really think possessing some genes in common implies a special relationship. We all possess many genes in common, after all, and many of our genes are also shared with other animals and even more distant relatives. - Gerry Quinn -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20111012/c2c8f5aa/attachment.htm>
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net