Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Typhon's nature

Lee Berman · 12 Oct 2011, 15:33 · from 2011-October.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: severiansola at hotmail.com (Lee Berman)
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:33:05 -0400
Subject: (urth) Typhon's nature
Message-ID: <SNT123-W2360D215A1FC534EBD680DCFE30 at phx.gbl>



>David Stockhoff: I agree that various technologies are deliberately blurred, as is 
>(famously) the line between technology and magic. This seems to be both 
>a stylistic approach and a philosophy.
 
Yes. I think this cuts to the crux of the debate. For some readers, Wolfe's work seems
to be a collection of rippingly good yarns. Any perception of an overarching philosophy 
and use of sub-text to convey it is seen as a distraction and diminishing of the story.
These different approaches create a difficult platform for discussion between parties.
 
I tend to agree with your assertion that a story which contains spaceships, ray guns, robots, 
aliens, anti-gravity, cloning and time travel simply has to have telepathy. How could 
it be left out? ;- ) 		 	   		  

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net