Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Silk's origin

Marc Aramini · 12 Oct 2011, 20:19 · from 2011-October.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: marcaramini at yahoo.com (Marc Aramini)
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:19:17 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: (urth) Silk's origin
In-Reply-To: <4E95EFC9.2080001 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1318450757.51710.YahooMailClassic at web161803.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>



--- On Wed, 10/12/11, James Wynn <crushtv at gmail.com> wrote:


> 
> If the vines are non-sentient, then how does the Rajan
> converse with it?
> J.

The trees are NOT nonsentient. They are the observers of the eucharist scene. Neither are the vines that have fed from them nonsentient, having stolen something of their nature.  (also possible that staff has been sharing a little sustenance from the Rajan, no?)  Not nonsentient, just vegetable.

And you know what I think the original vanished people are already, though there is some confusion as to whether they arose on Blue or Green. :(

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net