Silk's origin

James Wynn · 12 Oct 2011, 20:28 · from 2011-October.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn)
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:28:44 -0500
Subject: (urth) Silk's origin
In-Reply-To: <1318450757.51710.YahooMailClassic at web161803.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
References: <1318450757.51710.YahooMailClassic at web161803.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <4E95F87C.1090406 at gmail.com>


>> If the vines are non-sentient, then how does the Rajan
>> converse with it?
>> J.
> On 10/12/2011 3:19 PM, Marc Aramini wrote:
> The trees are NOT nonsentient. They are the observers of the eucharist scene. Neither are the vines that have fed from them nonsentient, having stolen something of their nature.  (also possible that staff has been sharing a little sustenance from the Rajan, no?)  Not nonsentient, just vegetable.
>
> And you know what I think the original vanished people are already, though there is some confusion as to whether they arose on Blue or Green. :(
>

Okay. I got confused for a minute. So--sorry if you answered this, 
someone asked you but I don't see the answer-- how/did they end up as 
non-sentient reptilians with an egg-laying life-cycle?

J.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net