Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Typhon's nature

David Stockhoff · 14 Oct 2011, 15:51 · from 2011-October.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff)
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:51:20 -0400
Subject: (urth) Typhon's nature
In-Reply-To: <8E6D1B3CDF0B49039DDFFD1D3852B7E2@Rover>
References: <CAM3O41JN3D5Fv4JaHHq1Ewg6VvHYY8NzVBF2VqL9OCHhBzU=eQ at mail.gmail.com><CAMBsQ=J+K_YSPe0hPne5-VZoUeYOZbTS9xhVFh8BS3WDgK1C3Q at mail.gmail.com><4E923EA3.1080003 at verizon.net><CAFjGSadywASrXg3zGQKQBZYKFjUQVg6vy92vPLpjm5VQrF--Kw at mail.gmail.com><4E92407C.1070308 at verizon.net><CAMBsQ=JEkBUmhgeW=Lidx+uV00=+EQNFW+Ms4zw5pDGvRme=sA at mail.gmail.com><4E929F13.8060704 at clueland.com>
	<4E92E879.1040103 at verizon.net><4E932B84.8000201 at clueland.com>
	<4E933279.4000305 at verizon.net><1318310722.89842.YahooMailNeo at web114709.mail.gq1.yahoo.com><4E944D2D.6040807 at verizon.net><1318478266.17919.YahooMailNeo at web114715.mail.gq1.yahoo.com><4E96F51D.1030301 at verizon.net><1318569770.67576.YahooMailNeo at web114713.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
	<4E9843C5.2060208 at verizon.net>
	<8E6D1B3CDF0B49039DDFFD1D3852B7E2@Rover>
Message-ID: <4E985A78.1050902 at verizon.net>

On 10/14/2011 10:54 AM, Gerry Quinn wrote:
> *From:* David Stockhoff <mailto:dstockhoff at verizon.net>
>
> *> *
> Positing that Typhon's labs could insert nanorobots into embryos doesn't
> *> *
> tell us what to do with the "carefully controlled matings" remark.
> Perhaps both are needed for optimal performance.
I'd only comment that at some point what might be complementary 
technologies become redundant technologies, and a story becomes 
inefficient and chokes on its own, er, waste.
> Really, I agree that genetic engineering is the most obvious 
> technological way to go in producing the desired effects, at least 
> with our current understanding. I?m willing to assume that that 
> (probably combined with carefully controlled matings) was probably 
> what was done. But I don?t think we know for sure, and if there was 
> some special reason to believe it was nanobots instead I?d happily 
> countenance it.
Absolutely.
> The telepathic internet described by Mamelta, after all, doesn?t seem 
> like it was necessarily implemented by genetic engineering. It might 
> have been, although that means Typhon would have had to wait two 
> decades to set it up, or else employed surgical modification or other 
> methods for the first generation, switching to genetic engineering later.
>
The Typhonic "mindernet" does seem like a key, but cryptic, phenomenon 
linking Mount Typhon to Mucor.


---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 111014-0, 10/14/2011
Tested on: 10/14/2011 11:51:21 AM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2011 AVAST Software.
http://www.avast.com




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net