[BGSpam]Re: Silk's origin

Marc Aramini · 16 Oct 2011, 18:06 · from 2011-October.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: marcaramini at yahoo.com (Marc Aramini)
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:06:49 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: (urth) [BGSpam]Re: Silk's origin
In-Reply-To: <CAJ8=rth_Rse6ujTrRY4zub_rWsTvzwavyoAiycK28m7Xy6L0ag at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1318788409.99336.YahooMailClassic at web161806.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>



--- On Sun, 10/16/11, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes <danldo at gmail.com> wrote:

 <gerry at bindweed.com>
> wrote:
> > 2. Inhumi are animals, and have no relation to
> vines.? [It may of course be
> > that particular plants of Green are of some
> nutritional significance to the
> > water-breathing juvenile form of the inhumi.]
> 
> I would say that this is an Earth- (or Urth-) centric idea.
> The
> distinction between "plant" and "animal" need not apply on
> an alien
> world.
> 

heh heh heh heh heh Green Man? (the irony) (or, heme groups not being what they used to, would it be chloroplasty?)

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net