lunar calendars [Digest urth.v028.n014]

Derek Bell · 28 Aug 1999, 21:15 · from urth-v0028.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Derek Bell <dbell at maths.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: (urth) Re: lunar calendars [Digest urth.v028.n014]
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 1999 22:15:38 +0100
Message-ID: <urth-v0028-0081 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0028/0081.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In message <199908122009.NAA08988 at lists1.best.com>, John Bishop writes:
>Mantis says:
>
>> Lunar calendars have thirteen months (13 x 28 =3D 364).  Period.
>
>Not that I ever read.  The islamic calendar still offically
>depends on a witness to the new Moon, the Judaic calendar used
>to (before it could rely on calculation), and the Classic=20
>world's lunar calendars did also (in particular, the calendars
>used to calculate possible eclipse times), though in later
>times astronomers calculated a sequence of short and long
>months that would be predictable (by reference) but never
>more than half a day off the real new Moon.

      The Islamic calendar is also exclusively *lunar* based with a
mean year shorter than the solar year. I once did a
back-of-the-envelope calculation about when the two calendars would
have the same year simultaneously - sometime after the 30th century,
IIRC.=20

>See Abell's astronomy text and various encyclopedias.  I once long
>ago programed up a calendar maker which used modern data to construct
>the 19 and 57 year calendars, but I don't know if the Classic ones
>would have had the same distribution of longs and shorts.

       I'd also suggest _Calendrical Calculations_ by Dershowitz and
Reingold - a web site with sample material is at
http://emr.cs.uiuc.edu/home/reingold/calendar-book/index.shtml

	Derek Bell

*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net