Father Inire as Dionysus
Lee Berman · 23 Oct 2011, 02:20
· from 2011-October.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: severiansola at hotmail.com (Lee Berman) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 22:20:19 -0400 Subject: (urth) Father Inire as Dionysus Message-ID: <SNT123-W558A8CA4333FD74E1467A0CFEE0 at phx.gbl> This post is for David Stockhoff to whom I promised an answer to his question on what benefit Severian might have for keeping Father Inire in such difficult to penetrate disguises. I think this question was carried on the assumption that Severian hoping to hide his and his family's incestuous nature was sufficient grounds to keep his family members hidden, to various degrees of difficulty. I could answer the question about Father Inire in similar terms. As a Greek god analog he is incestuous by nature. It is he who brings the embarassing curse of incest to Severian's family and keeping him in disguise is sort of a reflex. Mentioning him as royal vizier is okay but admiting he is Dorcas' husband, Cyriaca's uncle and certain others would be too revealing in the incest department. I could also answer that he is a cacogen, a sort of being which is held in some disgust in the Commonwealth. Perhaps Severian doesn't want to disgust his readers by admitting any closer association than necessary. Those answers are okay, though not completely satifying. But a recent insight suggested there may be more to it, if we consider another level of literary interpretation. Together, the two levels might be a good answer. David, in the past we've had discussions about the literary theme of "God is to universe as author is to story". And we I think we agreed that a religious scholar like Wolfe is insightful enough to consider that an author is more properly considered as a demiurge than god. Actually I'd like to digress and add to that discussion for a paragraph or two. The demiurge is the all-powerful creator of the material world and all that is in it. Where the demiurge is incomplete is that he lacks participation in the spirit. (and free will is a component of the spirit, so a demiurge cannot fully control a conscious human being). So, in literature, the author is the demiurge. He can control anything and everything in his story except for one thing. The spiritual component of a story, which is the reader. The author can influence but cannot control how each of his readers chooses to understand and interpret his stories. Anyway, there is a famous anecdote that I can't fully place just now. It was in some lecture where some person of note in the lupine universe surprised Wolfe with the question, "can we assume that the name of Number 5 and Maitre is Gene Wolfe?" Caught by surprise, Wolfe blurted out "yes!". But this admission of metafiction and veiled autobiography is not something Wolfe is prone to admit. That may be the only example. It isn't something new for analysts to suggest Gene WOlfe puts himself into his stories. Number 5, Weer, Severian, Ouen and Horn (not sure about Silkhorn) are oft noted candidates. We have discussed how Father Inire can be seen as a demiurgical figure to the Commonwealth as Tzadkiel is to his ship, as Typhon-Pas is to the Whorl and how The Outsider is to the universe of Briah. Wolfe has stated that Severian can be considered an aspect of The Outsider. If Wolfe recognizes his role as demiurge in creating the Sun series, is it possible he has put himself into the story AS The Outsider? This recognizes Severian as an aspect of himself but also makes Father Inire (and Typhon and Tzadkiel the Angel of Judgement) as aspects of himself. Could this be the reason Severian is so reticent about Father Inire? Does Wolfe make him do this to hide (but also provide a clue) that Gene Wolfe is lurking in various disguises throughout this story. Afterall, creating such human-form agents to accomplish their goals in the world is something that demiurges are prone to do.
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net