theories

Sergei SOLOVIEV · 23 Oct 2011, 15:29 · from 2011-October.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: soloviev at irit.fr (Sergei SOLOVIEV)
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 17:29:50 +0200
Subject: (urth) theories
Message-ID: <4EA432EE.9060907 at irit.fr>

I would like to say a few words as well -

I mostly agree with Gerry when I look and wonder at the endless 
discussions where (almost)
everybody tries to push forward his own theory and usually pays very little
attention to the solidity of his own arguments
 >Gerry Quinn

 >I think you (and some others) greatly misunderstand the nature of 
Wolfe?s books. You seem to think >of them as some sort of puzzle in 
which a hidden underlying story, cloned from some ancient myth or 
 >other, is disguised as a science fiction story. The object (you think) 
is to peel away the extraneous >matter and locate the crossword clues to 
the true story you think is lurking underneath. You clutch at >every 
possible classical reference because with those there?s always some way 
to play six degrees of >Kevin Bacon towards whatever scheme you are 
trying to impose on the story.
 >Why would Wolfe engage in a complicated, arbitrary, pointless scheme 
such as this? He is writing >his own stories.

There are especially many theories trying to declare that different 
personages are
identical, many theories trying to see incest everywhere... And theories 
are often so similar -
it reminds me a short story where a poor guy wanted to kill himself
and invented more and more methods - then went to a priest (the poor guy
was a believer) to ask, whether this new method is a suicide. Of course 
the answer
was "yes" - and he tried to invent another.

Question: the popularity of such theories, is it in some way a 
consequence of American cultural environment/tradition? I have seen a 
very similar situation at Nabokov's Forum, and much less - in the Forums 
that are mostly European or Russian (they have of course their own 
obsessive trends).

Best regards,

Sergei Soloviev

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net