Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Zoroastrianism? Buddhism?

DhSunanda · 03 Sep 1999, 15:34 · from urth-v0028.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: DhSunanda at aol.com
Subject: (urth) Zoroastrianism?  Buddhism?
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 11:34:52 EDT
Message-ID: <urth-v0028-0089 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0028/0089.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> "And the Ascian, his voice no louder than my own had been, and
> perhaps even softer, answered, 'How shall the state be most
> vigorous? It shall be most vigorous when it is without conflict.
> How shall disagreement be banished? By banishing the four causes
> of disagreement: lies, foolish talk, boastful talk, and talk
> which serves only to incite quarrels.=20

Hi, I'm new too, and the archive search doesn't seem to work for me, so I=20
don't know if the Buddhist side of the Ascians has been discussed before. I=20
know nothing about Zoroastrianism, but the Ascian's talk struck me on first=20
reading as a parody of both Communist and Buddhist texts. Leaving aside the=20
Communist....

'How can a state be vigorous?' is a question asked of the Buddha (via an=20
intermediary) by King Ajatasattu about the Vajjians. (Ajatasattu wants to u=
se=20
the answer to subvert the Vajjian State, and thus wage a winning war). The=20
Buddha lists 48 conditions that under which a state might be expected to=20
prosper and not decline.

The four causes of disagreement are a direct translation, if slight=20
rearrangement, of the traditional four speech precepts ('I undertake to=20
abstain from false speech, harsh speech, useless speech, slanderous speech'=
).=20
Traditional Buddhist precepts (guidelines for ethical action) are divided=20
into those for the body (physical actions), those for the speech=20
(communication acts) and those for the mind (wrong views about reality).

--Sunanda.

*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net