Father Inire as Dionysus

António Pedro Marques · 24 Oct 2011, 22:05 · from 2011-October.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QW50w7NuaW8gUGVkcm8gTWFycXVlcw==?=)
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 23:05:33 +0100
Subject: (urth) Father Inire as Dionysus
In-Reply-To: <CAM3O41Ksu9zX_6C-nXMuNpu9rP7MqzSN1mYWi1gxQs4vMmdWpA at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAM3O41Ksu9zX_6C-nXMuNpu9rP7MqzSN1mYWi1gxQs4vMmdWpA at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4EA5E12D.9000904 at gmail.com>

Andrew Mason wrote (24-10-2011 22:57):
> Antonio Pedro Marquez wrote:
>>
>> *Iirc*, it was put to rest that the Old Autarch was *not* the Appian
>> mentioned in the text; however, 'Appian' has become such a traditional name
>> for him, that as a matter of List Lore I think it can prevail (the name, not
>> the identification - so we have two Appians, the one in the text and the Old
>> Autarch). *Iirc*.
>
> Can the custom of calling the sea-monsters 'Megatherians' be
> sanctified in the same way?

For it to be the same way, it would have to have been settled that the 17 
Great Megatherians were not the sea-monsters.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net