Seal of Pas

David Stockhoff · 28 Oct 2011, 17:40 · from 2011-October.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff)
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:40:32 -0400
Subject: (urth) Seal of Pas
In-Reply-To: <BA0299ADB6564A06AB4B9D234E47EC61@Rover>
References: <SNT123-W17A419E8EF0B42F4E4843CCFD30 at phx.gbl><E88D3E82FDBA4F87AB682AD83F3534A9@Rover>
	<CAMwO0gyMMrQFH7m_1Dt+ydbmsLJu7+S_vOS_240pqtPfOyX4Sw at mail.gmail.com>
	<BA0299ADB6564A06AB4B9D234E47EC61@Rover>
Message-ID: <4EAAE910.8080303 at verizon.net>

On 10/28/2011 1:18 PM, Gerry Quinn wrote:
> *From:* Gwern Branwen <mailto:gwern0 at gmail.com>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Gerry Quinn <gerry at bindweed.com> wrote:
> > > From a naturalistic perspective, the numbers shouldn?t have any 
> significance
> > > that we would understand in the story: they should encode the contents
> > > and/or date of storage, serial numbers etc.
>
> > It has been a while, but wasn't there just one sequence of numbers
> > which made up a Seal of Pas? If the sequence doesn't change, then none
> > of those 3 suggestions would work (serial numbers which don't change
> > are not useful; it's unlikely that every single chamber would have
> > been sealed at the same time (especially since a datestamp that big
> > ought to be accurate down to really small units like nanoseconds) or
> > would have the same contents).
> We are only told the sequence on one such seal. I think we are to 
> infer that all the seals are different. Silk later finds the dust from 
> a broken seal of a cabinet that had contained human embryos, but he 
> does not encounter, or at least doesn?t notice, any other intact seals.
> The seal had about 36 digits. I just interpret it as the equivalent of 
> a barcode; we don?t know what information was on it but we can guess 
> what *kind* of information was there.
> - Gerry Quinn


It strikes me that a large part of the number's "significance" is that 
it is a sign of "our" era and of computer-generated IDs.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net