This week in Google Alerts
Adam Thornton · 02 Nov 2011, 16:51
· from 2011-November.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: athornton at gmail.com (Adam Thornton) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 11:51:38 -0500 Subject: (urth) This week in Google Alerts In-Reply-To: <SNT123-W463EDFE151E88D4BBC1D61CFD40 at phx.gbl> References: <SNT123-W463EDFE151E88D4BBC1D61CFD40 at phx.gbl> Message-ID: <CAP2nic0SLc0U4vZfBPqWw+9cyieAB6nFMiFiQZoWbgc69+p2Xg at mail.gmail.com> Not putting too much stock in this but the map of Oz is famous for its east/west reversal. On Nov 2, 2011 8:38 AM, "Lee Berman" <severiansola at hotmail.com> wrote: > > >David Stockhoff: It would be clever of Wolfe to have invented a world > that is totally > >free of Orientalism. > > Well, the Xanthic lands are mentioned. But I don't think we know where > they are. > > >David Stockhoff: Does anyone know offhand the textual proof that the > Andes are > >actually in the east? > > Good question. It was something I'd rested on precedent for a while. > Severian > does move north and east from Nessus to get to the mountains so Andes in > the > east was the assumption. > > But this map (originating with Mantis, I believe) explains it with the > reverse > idea: Nessus (Buenos Aires) is on the west coast of S. America. I had > thought > the updated LU put the Andes in the east but now I have to go check. > (I like the sea monsters. I guess the dragon/eel is Abaia. Perhaps the > whirlpool > is Scylla's counterpoint, Charybdis. But who is the crab?) > http://www.sjgames.com/pyramid/gifbin/p4/sunmaplg.jpg > > > >James Wynn: I think there is little to be gained in understanding Urth as > anything > >but is the future of our Earth. Perhaps there is some geekish appeal > positing that > >it is the future of an Earth in some parallel-dimension/universe. But for > >understanding the story and backdrop, there is little value one way or > the other. > >I think the interest in this debate in founded in ret-conning Briah to > >be theologically orthodox Christian. But with all the appeals to a > >gnostic framework in the story, why bother? > > I see the logic. Parallel or series universes are super-nifty cool Star > Trekky fare. > But for this story, I don't think the understanding to be gained by > viewing Urth as a > past iteration ofEarth is very geeky in nature at all. It think it is > almost purely > religious. I don't think there is an attempt to make Briah Orthodox > Christian. > > As previously mentioned, I think the crux of the disagreement is whether > there is a > Christ at all in Briah. If there is, Urth is the future of Earth. If there > is no > Christ, Urth is some previous version. It all boils down to that.(and it > makes sense > that some here would be more open to the idea of a universe without Christ > than others.) > _______________________________________________ > Urth Mailing List > To post, write urth at urth.net > Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20111102/ad4e339a/attachment-0001.htm>
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net