This week in Google Alerts

David Stockhoff · 02 Nov 2011, 16:55 · from 2011-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff)
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 12:55:50 -0400
Subject: (urth) This week in Google Alerts
In-Reply-To: <CAJ8=rthuRTy0YaZB16+RdOBaz1DdSoWeJ9e3G9Opq0G4U-DRxA at mail.gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W1869874CA7BA2BCE11E6D2CFD70 at phx.gbl>
	<4EAFFC7C.3010403 at verizon.net>	<240CBF6F86C9428F9A03936C1191CAFF@Rover>
	<4EB14E96.50902 at verizon.net>	<26BBA497A83445298F756A6C9BF971C3@Rover>
	<CAJ8=rth6ubZij0x0Hab9p_iMxORNuTX=Qesk6R2GhGreqswfJg at mail.gmail.com>
	<4EB16D69.6090909 at verizon.net>
	<1320251101.42647.YahooMailNeo at web121001.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
	<CAJ8=rtg7cxaJMXsu3D94BE7waYhH=u2CFKge4wLkVH7WnejUDA at mail.gmail.com>
	<1320251737.45741.YahooMailNeo at web121004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
	<CAJ8=rthuRTy0YaZB16+RdOBaz1DdSoWeJ9e3G9Opq0G4U-DRxA at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4EB17616.8080708 at verizon.net>

On 11/2/2011 12:40 PM, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:
> Craig Brewer wrote:
>
>> In the end, I prefer it to be "a really
>> long time" and not knowing exactly is a more appropriate sense of history
>> that Severian has throughout most of the book. This is one of those cases
>> where I prefer it when the "clues" don't add up to a consistent picture.
> Man's got a point. Perhaps "when" is not one of the mysteries we're
> intended to solve -- and really, other than satisfying our SF-nerd,
> anal-retentive desire to nail everything down (to which I plead as
> guilty as anyone), what difference does it make? Twenty thousand and a
> few hundred million years are both (honestly) far enough into the
> future that our minds can't really hold them. After all, if you go
> only a few thousand years into the _past_ you're into the shadows of
> myth and uncertainty.
>

Absolutely. Still, we ought to be able to answer the question: Are the 
mountains in the east?

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net