This week in Google Alerts

James Wynn · 02 Nov 2011, 22:18 · from 2011-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn)
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 17:18:43 -0500
Subject: (urth) This week in Google Alerts
In-Reply-To: <CAJ8=rtg7cxaJMXsu3D94BE7waYhH=u2CFKge4wLkVH7WnejUDA at mail.gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W1869874CA7BA2BCE11E6D2CFD70 at phx.gbl>
	<4EAFFC7C.3010403 at verizon.net>
	<240CBF6F86C9428F9A03936C1191CAFF@Rover>
	<4EB14E96.50902 at verizon.net>
	<26BBA497A83445298F756A6C9BF971C3@Rover>
	<CAJ8=rth6ubZij0x0Hab9p_iMxORNuTX=Qesk6R2GhGreqswfJg at mail.gmail.com>
	<4EB16D69.6090909 at verizon.net>
	<1320251101.42647.YahooMailNeo at web121001.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
	<CAJ8=rtg7cxaJMXsu3D94BE7waYhH=u2CFKge4wLkVH7WnejUDA at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4EB1C1C3.2050709 at gmail.com>

>> Craig Brewer<cnbrewer at yahoo.com>  wrote:
>> But the question it does beg to me seems to be that of why the Sun is dying.
>> In 20,000 years, it wouldn't burn out naturally, right? And if it was
>> artificial, then who/why? That seems to be the real issue of the time lag,
>> and I think it's been hashed out here before.
> Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:
> We know that the Sun is not dying naturally, that a black hole has
> been planted in it. But I believe that a few thousand years would be
> too short a time for _that_ to make the described difference...though
> Typhon says that it's happening faster than predicted, so current
> theory is of relatively little value here.
>

Wolfe has said many times that tBotNS is about what would happen if 
humanity remained until it's the planet's resources have been depleted. 
He likened it to a family with a fabulously wealthy ancestor that now 
lives in the same house but desperately poor because they have run 
through all the money.

It feels to me that this would take longer than 20,000 years. Still, 
maybe not. Some people think we'll run though our inheritance of 
petroleum formed from 500 million years of sea life within the next 
century.  So, it is what it is. 20,000 is by far plenty of time for our 
age to become myth many times over. No one reads cuneiform today.  In 
northern Iraq, there is a 12,000 year old temple, employing intricate 
relief art , yet we know nothing of significance about civilization 
older than 5,000 years.

J.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net