Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Hyacinth

António Pedro Marques · 03 Nov 2011, 21:40 · from 2011-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QW50w7NuaW8gUGVkcm8gTWFycXVlcw==?=)
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 21:40:20 +0000
Subject: (urth) Hyacinth
In-Reply-To: <4EB3068A.7010809 at gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W50B5C725DAD07428DEDEBBCFD50 at phx.gbl>
	<4EB2F5D0.1070904 at gmail.com> <4EB3027B.5030909 at gmail.com>
	<4EB3068A.7010809 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4EB30A44.9010802 at gmail.com>

James Wynn wrote (03-11-2011 21:24):
>
>>> Scottish brogue, IIRC
>>>
>> Antonio wrote:
>> Iyrc? Are these rhetorical questions? Everybody knows what Pig speaks.
>> Do you also not remember you've presented the Fava-Hy theory just a few
>> months ago, albeit with not so much detail?
>
> ???
> On this subject, I like to give people are reason to NOT pick irrelevant
> fights. "IIRC" was just one of those ways. I don't want to get in a fight
> over whether it is Welsh or what-have-you.

In matters of opinion, you have showed no problems in asserting stuff 
without qualification. In a matter of fact such as this, you take care to 
place such caveats. How is the unwary reader to know what is established and 
what is conjecture?
You should moderate your temper, btw.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net