This week in Google alerts
António Pedro Marques · 04 Nov 2011, 19:57
· from 2011-November.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: entonio at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QW50w7NuaW8gUGVkcm8gTWFycXVlcw==?=) Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 19:57:36 +0000 Subject: (urth) This week in Google alerts In-Reply-To: <4EB43F93.4060807 at irit.fr> References: <SNT123-W3944B1093A3A54057F5AD8CFDA0 at phx.gbl> <944700BE64674BAFA2F5935E9AE095DE@Rover> <4EB42C37.8040704 at gmail.com> <4EB438DB.3000005 at irit.fr> <4EB43D64.8080704 at verizon.net> <4EB43F93.4060807 at irit.fr> Message-ID: <4EB443B0.6070209 at gmail.com> Sergei SOLOVIEV wrote (04-11-2011 19:40): > I think sceptic reaction to many theories is healthy - every detail > cannot be principal. I'm reminded of a PM candidate we had 16 years ago for whom, when asked, every single issue would be a priority of his government. Of course, all the people who think everyone's conditions should be above the average voted for him and he did become PM.
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net