Urth Net

← back to the conversation

This week in Google alerts

Marc Aramini · 04 Nov 2011, 20:27 · from 2011-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: marcaramini at yahoo.com (Marc Aramini)
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 13:27:30 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: (urth) This week  in Google alerts
In-Reply-To: <4EB43F93.4060807 at irit.fr>
Message-ID: <1320438450.36552.YahooMailClassic at web161804.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>



--- On Fri, 11/4/11, Sergei SOLOVIEV <soloviev at irit.fr> wrote:

> From: Sergei SOLOVIEV <soloviev at irit.fr>
> Subject: Re: (urth) This week  in Google alerts
> To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net>
> Date: Friday, November 4, 2011, 12:40 PM
> It means (IMHO) that in a good book
> (and in its interpretation) there is an hierarchy of ideas.
> If all are equally genial they cancel each other, and
> overall impression is poor. To me,
> if you try to turn every detail into the key to all
> secrets, it is exactly what will happen.
> There are details that help to create certain background
> feeling (level of technology,
> type of society, psychology of characters), there are
> others that explain for example
> the relations between personages and important turns of the
> plot (like real relationship
> between Talos and Baldanders) and indeed others that may be
> key to principal ideas
> of the author. I think sceptic reaction to many theories is
> healthy - every detail
> cannot be principal.
> 
> Sergei
> 

Sergei, if we deny the underpinnings of the foliage in this sequence and its thematic relevance and believe an allusion to a god of the wood is acccidental, then we are really missing the boat completely and attributing to accident which is simply a pattern of Wolfe.

uncategorically.  I see the central theme of deities of the wood very differently than Lee does but it's there for sure.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net