This week in Google alerts

David Stockhoff · 05 Nov 2011, 15:22 · from 2011-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff)
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2011 11:22:19 -0400
Subject: (urth) This week  in Google alerts
In-Reply-To: <6C8AB1ED91C746E68F9E8F67AA9B3F1B@Rover>
References: <SNT123-W3944B1093A3A54057F5AD8CFDA0 at phx.gbl><944700BE64674BAFA2F5935E9AE095DE@Rover><4EB42C37.8040704 at gmail.com><EFB0B66565F54B10A0926D481A145C64@Rover>
	<4D3629B3-DAEF-45E0-80BE-7B6890F91A40 at gmail.com>
	<6C8AB1ED91C746E68F9E8F67AA9B3F1B@Rover>
Message-ID: <4EB554AB.1080603 at verizon.net>

On 11/5/2011 10:30 AM, Gerry Quinn wrote:
> How come nobody even mentioned the clearly stated explanation of 
> Silent and Silver Silk before now?  Those who object to my claim that 
> my methodology largely involves reading the text have some questions 
> to answer.  How can one run with the faun theory and seemingly not 
> even notice the other?

I thought the reason was that they were readily seen, known, and agreed 
upon. Not mentioning doesn't mean not noticing.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net