vanished people=Hieros
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 10 Nov 2011, 17:23
· from 2011-November.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: danldo at gmail.com (Dan'l Danehy-Oakes) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:23:52 -0800 Subject: (urth) vanished people=Hieros In-Reply-To: <4EBC077D.3010605 at gmail.com> References: <1320942761.92088.YahooMailClassic at web161803.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <4EBC077D.3010605 at gmail.com> Message-ID: <CAJ8=rtj_N+oGmmo-eHYGJK-3_F22s2PO3-00Su7b-kwnKn76qA at mail.gmail.com> I don't think Green can be Urth's past, because that would put Blue somewhere in the Solar System's past, and I don't think that works. On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:18 AM, James Wynn <crushtv at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> James Wynn<crushtv at gmail.com> ?wrote: >>> >>> Question: Wouldn't the Green Urth theory be easier if Green >>> were in Urth's very distant past? That would argue that the >>> Dionysus references are a clue to how the myth got there in >>> the first place?*~ ?I understand that you want the City >>> of the Inhumi to be Nessus but the clues are not >>> overwhelming. Perhaps the Rajan's seeming parallel >>> description of the city and Nessus was only an implied >>> connection because they are both cities on the same planet >>> or coincidentally at the same place. >>> >>> *~ A Greek mythographer (I don't remember which one) >>> attested that although Dionysus as the "newest" of the >>> Olympians, he was actually much older...maybe the oldest of >>> the gods. >>> >>> J. >> >> Marc Aramini wrote: >> My only concern here is: why the past? ?How did they get there if they >> left at Typhon's time? > > They got there with the help of the Neighbors. They got there with the help > of the Heirogrammates. Any number of ways, intentional and unintentional. > >> ? Obviously with time travel there could be past or present, but why would >> the past be any easier than the future? > > Well, personally, I think the hybridization of the sentient and non-sentient > life (if true) is referred to only in the the vaguest possible terms. In > order to overcome just ONE of the major obstacles in the Green Urth theory, > I have to accept the Hybrid theory whole. Strategically, I'd like a little > more wiggle room. I'd like to be able to consider the Green Urth theory > separate from the Hybird theory. Putting the Neighbors and Inhumi in the > distant past allows that. > > Q: "Where are the Neighbors in Severian's time?" > A: They are every tree he encounters because the Neighbors are away in > dream-travel where most or all have died, leaving soulless trees that > continue to reproduce. > > Q: How did the wildlife of Blue become so alien? > A: Because the evolved on Verthandi in the very distant past before it lost > its atmosphere. > > A major problem with Green being the future Urth is "how far in the future"? > More than 3000 years after Typhon, I'd say, for it to have been later than > the end of Urth of the New Sun. > >> Why would he go forward in time when he's thinking about Green before the >> evil of the inhumi and winds up on Urth? > > Because Rigiglio is thinking of Nessus and the places are the same. From the > position of the travelers, Nessus is in their relative past. Are they going > forward in Time or back? It's no harder than going back. If Green is Urth, > then for the Rajan to meet Severian, he has to be traveling back in time or > forward in time. > >> It makes no more sense at best and still has all the same problems as the >> Green is future urth, in my opinion. > > It totally eliminates one of the obstacles to the Green Urth theory without > the *need* for a hybidization theory ?which... > 1) you are not claiming Wolfe has confirmed. > > 2) Is just a really big walnut to swallow whole. > > 3) Could still be true even if Green is in Urth's past. > > On the other hand, the Ancient Green Urth theory... > > 1) Feeds into the extreme archeology theories of ancient human capabilities > and civilization to which Wolfe is quite inclined. > > 2) Provides narrative rationale (rather than merely thematic ones) for the > Dionysus references. > >> [...] >> >> The man in the colorless cloak with a stiff birdlike gait sure seems like >> a familiar figure, doesn't he? ?Then again, the blue glow and the spider >> like fellow on Blue seemed familiar too, but in the interview Wolfe said >> that it was not urth/ushas, 2 urths, or 2 ushas so I don't know what to say. > > Well, the cloak looks familiar. I'm not sure about the gait. But Severian is > a Time Traveler. Why would he not be found in the distant past? > > J. > _______________________________________________ > Urth Mailing List > To post, write urth at urth.net > Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net > -- Dan'l Danehy-Oakes
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net