Babbiehorn?: Was: a sincere question mostly for roy

Marc Aramini · 16 Nov 2011, 15:29 · from 2011-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: marcaramini at yahoo.com (Marc Aramini)
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 07:29:31 -0800 (PST)
Subject: (urth) Babbiehorn?: Was: a sincere question mostly for roy
In-Reply-To: <4EC3D544.6020807 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1321457371.61317.YahooMailClassic at web161805.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>

I don't know what you are saying here Antonio.  Babbie is not just a hus in Rttw because he's carrying Horn.  Yes, that is the opening of BtLS where SILK catches the ball.  He's Silk again, just Silk in denial.

--- On Wed, 11/16/11, Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: (urth) Babbiehorn?: Was: a sincere question mostly for roy
> To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net>
> Date: Wednesday, November 16, 2011, 7:22 AM
> Marc Aramini wrote (16-11-2011
> 15:07):
> 
> > You guys are not mentioning the prophecy: I see you,
> Horn, riding a
> > beast with 3 horns (2 tusks and one soul of Horn)
> > 
> > I am very very confident the majority of Horn goes
> into Babbie when he
> > says farewell, and it explains Babbie's huh huh huh
> and behavior when he
> > see's Horn's son on Rttw, throwing down the guy who
> attacks him.
> 
> Objectively/textually, I've pointed out why Babbie in RW
> isn't just a hus (if he were, he'd look just like a hus
> while dream travelling), yet no one seems to be interested
> in agreeing or disputing that argument (of course one can
> debate it, but I'm positive there is no other convincing
> explanation).
> 
> But what James is saying is that, *besides that*, a bit of
> Babbie went into the Rajan. Because no one here thinks that
> it was Babbie grabbing the quill with his hus hands to write
> that paragraph, right?
> 
> > And it explains the tone change in the end of OBW, and
> why at the end of
> > that book it finally says, I CAUGHT THE BALL, I WON
> THE GAME - he is
> > finally Silk again, though Silk in denial.
> 
> But does no one connect that phrase with the opening scene
> of the BLS?
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net