Babbiehorn?: Was: a sincere question mostly for roy

David Stockhoff · 16 Nov 2011, 15:32 · from 2011-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff)
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:32:01 -0500
Subject: (urth) Babbiehorn?: Was: a sincere question mostly for roy
In-Reply-To: <4EC3D544.6020807 at gmail.com>
References: <1321456027.4772.YahooMailClassic at web161805.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
	<4EC3D544.6020807 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4EC3D771.1080108 at verizon.net>

On 11/16/2011 10:22 AM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote:
> Marc Aramini wrote (16-11-2011 15:07):
>
>> You guys are not mentioning the prophecy: I see you, Horn, riding a
>> beast with 3 horns (2 tusks and one soul of Horn)
>>
>> I am very very confident the majority of Horn goes into Babbie when he
>> says farewell, and it explains Babbie's huh huh huh and behavior when he
>> see's Horn's son on Rttw, throwing down the guy who attacks him.
>
> Objectively/textually, I've pointed out why Babbie in RW isn't just a 
> hus (if he were, he'd look just like a hus while dream travelling), 
> yet no one seems to be interested in agreeing or disputing that 
> argument (of course one can debate it, but I'm positive there is no 
> other convincing explanation).
>
> But what James is saying is that, *besides that*, a bit of Babbie went 
> into the Rajan. Because no one here thinks that it was Babbie grabbing 
> the quill with his hus hands to write that paragraph, right?

No, he might be capable of it but would not be motivated to do it.
>
>> And it explains the tone change in the end of OBW, and why at the end of
>> that book it finally says, I CAUGHT THE BALL, I WON THE GAME - he is
>> finally Silk again, though Silk in denial.
>
> But does no one connect that phrase with the opening scene of the BLS?

Sure! Silk is back.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net