Babbiehorn?: Was: a sincere question mostly for roy

James Wynn · 16 Nov 2011, 17:03 · from 2011-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn)
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:03:50 -0600
Subject: (urth) Babbiehorn?: Was: a sincere question mostly for roy
In-Reply-To: <796F1549C3CB48109042FC1297BF8585@Rover>
References: <163817.55332.qm at web58206.mail.re3.yahoo.com><006a01cba98c$08dce140$76d04a0c@rclackey><4EC2EA57.6050603 at verizon.net><4EC2F7F8.50603 at verizon.net>
	<4EC32090.3080402 at gmail.com><B9D6EE0B77924CE3B3A6141A77AE9C7B@Rover>	<4EC3D6A0.3010702 at gmail.com><4EC3D837.8090403 at verizon.net>
	<4EC3DA32.4020008 at gmail.com><4EC3E04C.9050009 at verizon.net>
	<4EC3E217.4000008 at gmail.com>
	<796F1549C3CB48109042FC1297BF8585@Rover>
Message-ID: <4EC3ECF6.7020009 at gmail.com>

On 11/16/2011 10:58 AM, Gerry Quinn wrote:
> *From:* James Wynn <mailto:crushtv at gmail.com>
> > David Stockhoff wrote:
> > > Ah, I see. I don;t have a page but it's
> > > He sat up cold and stiff, and crossed his arms to put his freezing
> > > fingers in his armpits. Mucor told him, "It's drier farther on. Meet
> > > me where the bios sleep." She was sitting cross-legged on the water,
> > > and like the water, transparent. He wanted to ask her to guide him to
> > >  the surface; at the sound of his voice she vanished with the rest of
> > > his dream, leaving only a shimmer of greenish light like slime on the
> > > water.
>
> > Ah ha! See? That's the way she disappeared on the gondola. But it is
> > different from the way she disappears on the night of Pike's ghost.
> It's not very different, surely?  The main difference is that she is 
> not said to be transparent in the first episode, but maybe that's 
> because it's brighter in the tunnel. [...]
> Here he speaks and she vanishes.  In the first incident he blinks and 
> she vanishes.
> No slime, but that's probably just the reflection of the tunnel lights.

Now your are being ornery. I already stated that it was the same on the 
gondolas (no tunnel lights). Transparency is NOT (I reiterate) NOT the 
only difference or even the significant difference. The main difference 
is how she leaves.

***
a shimmer of greenish light like slime...
****
a ghostly image
remained, like a green glimmer upon a pool
******

I don't think its fair to act dense and to wear me down by making me 
repeat everything.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20111116/bf34ee1a/attachment.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net