Babbiehorn?: Was: a sincere question mostly for roy
James Wynn · 16 Nov 2011, 19:22
· from 2011-November.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:22:33 -0600 Subject: (urth) Babbiehorn?: Was: a sincere question mostly for roy In-Reply-To: <8B62A70E4701459087B6534260A0D361@Rover> References: <163817.55332.qm at web58206.mail.re3.yahoo.com><006a01cba98c$08dce140$76d04a0c@rclackey><4EC2EA57.6050603 at verizon.net><4EC2F7F8.50603 at verizon.net><4EC32090.3080402 at gmail.com><B9D6EE0B77924CE3B3A6141A77AE9C7B@Rover><4EC3D6A0.3010702 at gmail.com><785184038C7F43F5B8904AF2ACEEDAEC@Rover><4EC3EA56.5040304 at verizon.net><269ABB99AB7A4844B481781484E4FFE0@Rover><4EC3F0F1.8050004 at gmail.com><361A3DF9EDE34095B43F57AFC934C667@Rover> <4EC3FB63.7010301 at gmail.com> <8B62A70E4701459087B6534260A0D361@Rover> Message-ID: <4EC40D79.1080009 at gmail.com> > > *From:* James Wynn <mailto:crushtv at gmail.com> > Why is she hanging out with her own "Oreb"? > Gerry Quinn wrote: > Is she? Mucor, Pike and Oreb appear at roughly the same time and > place, but no one of them is actually "with" any other. Silk wakes up > and sees Oreb hop out the window. Then he sees Mucor by his bed. > Mucor vanishes. Just a big coincidence? > He goes down and interrogates Oreb, who denies being there, although > Silk doesn't believe him. [Silk thinks Oreb was frightened by Mucor > and jumped out the windows, dropping down to the kitchen window > below. We aren't told whether this is what happened or not, but it's > at least possible.] This is Silk's rationalization since...what else could it be? In literature, this is called irony. The reader is expected to arrive at meaning that the character cannot. But this is a Wolfe novel. The meaning is unavailable to the reader until after he has read all 7 volumes. Even before SS was published, readers recognized that the Oreb in the window was problem. This post demonstrates how unuseful your pose is toward Wolfe's works. It is one thing to say "I want to use only overt statements of fact in the books to resolve puzzles" (good luck to you). It is another thing to say, "I have not succeeded in resolving a puzzle using my method, therefore no puzzle exists". > Silk hears noises upstairs again and goes up. This time he sees > Pike's ghost. He recognises "the aged augur" as Pike. No staves or > missing eyes are mentioned. No bird is present.Pike is wearing a > blue-trimmed calot hat -- does the Rajan wear such a thing? Um...(as soothingly as possible) no. This is *Pike's* callotte that Silk wore in his robbery. The Rajan leaves it behind when he leaves. Why would you even ask such a question? > I don't know where Pike's ghost comes from. But I am unconvinced that > he is Silk from the future. Does Pike look like Silk? He should look > like Blood, if anyone. One very obvious conclusion is that Pike looks as Silk will look when he is old. Alternately, an obvious conclusion following from that is that Pike and Master Malrubius look strikingly similar. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20111116/ed30564a/attachment.htm>
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net