Babbiehorn?: Was: a sincere question mostly for roy

entonio at gmail.com · 17 Nov 2011, 14:18 · from 2011-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (entonio at gmail.com)
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:18:33 +0000
Subject: (urth) Babbiehorn?: Was: a sincere question mostly for roy
In-Reply-To: <C762298140DE48B594A069E418E71162@Rover>
References: <163817.55332.qm at web58206.mail.re3.yahoo.com><006a01cba98c$08dce140$76d04a0c@rclackey><4EC2EA57.6050603 at verizon.net><4EC2F7F8.50603 at verizon.net><4EC32090.3080402 at gmail.com><B9D6EE0B77924CE3B3A6141A77AE9C7B@Rover><4EC3D6A0.3010702 at gmail.com><785184038C7F43F5B8904AF2ACEEDAEC@Rover><4EC3EA56.5040304 at verizon.net><269ABB99AB7A4844B481781484E4FFE0@Rover><4EC3F0F1.8050004 at gmail.com><361A3DF9EDE34095B43F57AFC934C667@Rover><4EC3FB63.7010301 at gmail.com><8B62A70E4701459087B6534260A0D361@Rover><4EC40D79.1080009 at gmail.com><3509EB1DEEA74B1A868D1A0E3A6D2E7A@Rover><4EC425DF.8000303 at gmail.com><CAJ8=rthM7y+s2Jk+2OF6t1JUhYrhJLNKEmkcvQMj752B=Hz6Xw at mail.gmail.com><4EC42AFA.2000008 at gmail.com><F3ABD324B1E84461A089FEF226F8FC30@Rover><4EC4872B.4020603 at verizon.net><3FD4B4C9049148FCA9E1C2193CFBB5F0@Rover>
	<4EC5091F.10007 at verizon.net>
	<C762298140DE48B594A069E418E71162@Rover>
Message-ID: <3F932730-29C7-4BD2-81FB-260819DB47CA at gmail.com>

No dia 2011/11/17, ?s 13:51, "Gerry Quinn" <gerry at bindweed.com>  
escreveu:
> The theories above make some kind of sense.  More sense, IMO, than a  
> 43-year old one-eyed Silk travelling back in time with Mucor and  
> looking exactly like a 70+ year old Pike.  Who is never indicated to  
> look anything like Silk, and whose son is Blood, who doesn?t appear  
> to look like Silk either.

I don't like the ghost is Rajan thing either, but it hinges on the  
crucial point, the bird (ie the ghost must be the Rajan for no reason  
other than the Rajan can produce an Oreb). There must be a reason for  
a bird there. In earlier times many went with Quetzal, but for some  
reason I don't like that 100% either.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net