Babbiehorn?: Was: a sincere question mostly for roy

Lee Berman · 17 Nov 2011, 14:27 · from 2011-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: severiansola at hotmail.com (Lee Berman)
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:27:01 -0500
Subject: (urth) Babbiehorn?: Was: a sincere question mostly for roy
Message-ID: <SNT123-W11C0F3D980B3A27EFB7210CFC70 at phx.gbl>

> > David Stockhoff: That's impossible because Oreb does not lie. Wolfe is faithful to
> > character above all else.

>>Antonion Pedro Marques: > And did he play dead or did he faint?

>David: Ditto.

Double ditto. Oreb is only given two words and with them I think we may trust that he is 
always right and never lies. Just an authorial constant. I see Oreb less as a character
and more as an oracle, a status his rescue from sacrifice at the beginning might grant him.
Silk learns more from his living pronouncements than his dead innards.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net