Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Babbiehorn?: Was: a sincere question mostly for roy

António Pedro Marques · 17 Nov 2011, 17:25 · from 2011-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QW50w7NuaW8gUGVkcm8gTWFycXVlcw==?=)
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:25:35 +0000
Subject: (urth) Babbiehorn?: Was: a sincere question mostly for roy
In-Reply-To: <4EC540FD.1050606 at gmail.com>
References: <163817.55332.qm at web58206.mail.re3.yahoo.com><006a01cba98c$08dce140$76d04a0c@rclackey><4EC2EA57.6050603 at verizon.net><4EC2F7F8.50603 at verizon.net><4EC32090.3080402 at gmail.com><B9D6EE0B77924CE3B3A6141A77AE9C7B@Rover><4EC3D6A0.3010702 at gmail.com><785184038C7F43F5B8904AF2ACEEDAEC@Rover><4EC3EA56.5040304 at verizon.net><269ABB99AB7A4844B481781484E4FFE0@Rover><4EC3F0F1.8050004 at gmail.com><361A3DF9EDE34095B43F57AFC934C667@Rover><4EC3FB63.7010301 at gmail.com><8B62A70E4701459087B6534260A0D361@Rover><4EC40D79.1080009 at gmail.com><3509EB1DEEA74B1A868D1A0E3A6D2E7A@Rover><4EC425DF.8000303 at gmail.com><CAJ8=rthM7y+s2Jk+2OF6t1JUhYrhJLNKEmkcvQMj752B=Hz6Xw at mail.gmail.com><4EC42AFA.2000008 at gmail.com><F3ABD324B1E84461A089FEF226F8FC30@Rover>
	<4EC4872B.4020603 at verizon.net>
	<3FD4B4C9049148FCA9E1C2193CFBB5F0@Rover>
	<4EC5091F.10007 at verizon.net> <4EC520E6.3080505 at gmail.com>
	<4EC536B6.70103 at gmail.com> <4EC540FD.1050606 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4EC5438F.8000207 at gmail.com>

James Wynn wrote (17-11-2011 17:14):
>
>>
>>> It is inconceivable that Silk, who has
>>> performed dozens if not hundreds of sacrifices by this time, would not know
>>> the difference between a dead bird and a fainted one or a faking one. Oreb
>>> was possessed (most likely) by Pas.
>>
>> Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote:
>> By dead Pas, who was where?, and what's possession got to do with looking
>> dead or resurrecting?
>
> Possessed creatures have capabilities beyond those possible for
> non-possessed creatures. When Chenille is possessed by Scylla she leaps out
> of the water like a dolphin. When she is possessed by Kyrpris, she throws a
> knife twice hitting precisely the same spot. Marble possessed by Echidna
> summons all the snakes from the neighborhood. Since I do not believe that a
> "normal" night chough can play dead sufficiently to fool an augur
> (particularly one very motivated for the animal NOT to have died during
> sacrifice), I assume he was possessed. Since black birds are sacred to Pas,
> Hierax, and Tartaros but only one of these has "died", I consider the death
> a signal that it is Pas possessing Oreb.

Ok, so you're saying that Pas possessed Oreb then made him play dead, rather 
than resurrected a dead Oreb. Someone could comb the story for evidence that 
Oreb was possessed at that point (and a way for it to have happened), maybe 
that would lead us somewhere.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net