Babbiehorn?: Was: a sincere question mostly for roy

António Pedro Marques · 20 Nov 2011, 02:58 · from 2011-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?utf-8?Q?Ant=C3=B3nio_Pedro_Marques?=)
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 02:58:11 +0000
Subject: (urth) Fwd: Babbiehorn?: Was: a sincere question mostly for roy
In-Reply-To: <1321736042.32576.YahooMailClassic at web161802.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
References: <1321736042.32576.YahooMailClassic at web161802.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <7C088A13-7E82-4193-88BE-FFC3B2F08744 at gmail.com>

No dia 19/11/2011, ?s 20:54, Marc Aramini <marcaramini at yahoo.com> escreveu:

> Also, your contention that Horn is part neighbor is good, I am just not sure he is fully neighbor and fully human in that way.  He is still spiritually inferior to Silk even after his time in the pit: a self-serving man.

Come on, the guy leaves everything he loves to go on a hopeless errand which even if fulfilled won't bring him any special thing. Why do the both of you dislike Horn so much? Silk liked him. 

>   If the neighbor portion of him is there, it has not made him "better" in the way that Silk is good, so I can't quite liken it to the condition of Christ being fully human and fully divine. 

But that's not because the analogy fails, it's because the Neighbours aren't divine.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net