Babbiehorn?: Was: a sincere question mostly for roy

António Pedro Marques · 20 Nov 2011, 15:34 · from 2011-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?utf-8?Q?Ant=C3=B3nio_Pedro_Marques?=)
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:34:39 +0000
Subject: (urth) Fwd: Babbiehorn?: Was: a sincere question mostly for roy
In-Reply-To: <4EC9152F.5070205 at verizon.net>
References: <1321736042.32576.YahooMailClassic at web161802.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
	<4EC819A0.5040902 at verizon.net>
	<1D11B4B1-803C-4ABB-8252-037BC121B15C at gmail.com>
	<4EC90641.6050204 at verizon.net>
	<9F2ED10D-3AA9-4DD1-96C3-23762286E651 at gmail.com>
	<4EC9152F.5070205 at verizon.net>
Message-ID: <B1CA5BFC-ABA3-41F8-8815-421E05C027FB at gmail.com>

No dia 20/11/2011, ?s 14:56, David Stockhoff <dstockhoff at verizon.net> escreveu:

> On 11/20/2011 9:50 AM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote:
>> No dia 20/11/2011, ?s 13:53, David Stockhoff<dstockhoff at verizon.net>  escreveu:
>> 
>>> On 11/19/2011 10:01 PM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote:
>>>> No dia 19/11/2011, ?s 21:03, David Stockhoff<dstockhoff at verizon.net>   escreveu:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 11/19/2011 3:54 PM, Marc Aramini wrote:
>>>>>> I was reading shakespeare today and the term huswife came up, and I realized it was just a form of house: I think Babbie is like a spirit house.
>>>>> Considering the references to houses, and that Wolfe originally wanted to use the name "hushog" (I don't know who pointed that out), meaning house-pig, I'd say that case is nailed shut. And it strengthens your idea that What was left of Horn went into Babbie,
>>>> It gets me a bit miffed that people keep repeating this in disregard to the fact that Hide takes the time to mention the Rajan looks more like Horn in (some) dream travels than in real life.
>>> So why don't you point out the passages? I haven't gotten there yet.
>> I'll give you some more time, then.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> I guess I really don't understand when people get miffed at all. If you have counter-evidence or a counter-pattern in response to an identified pattern, voice it. Saying "evidence X strengthens theory Y" doesn't mean nothing else exists. I never said all of Horn is gone at the end of OBW and in fact have stated repeatedly that I think he is not all gone.

Marc thinks he's all gone and James thinks he was never there (fsvo 'was': apparently, sometimes James makes a point of saying he isn't there, others he makes of point of saying he is there in a way and it's all a bit cloudy anyhow).

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net