Babbiehorn?: Was: a sincere question mostly for roy

Marc Aramini · 20 Nov 2011, 15:48 · from 2011-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: marcaramini at yahoo.com (Marc Aramini)
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 07:48:58 -0800 (PST)
Subject: (urth) Fwd: Babbiehorn?: Was: a sincere question mostly for roy
In-Reply-To: <B1CA5BFC-ABA3-41F8-8815-421E05C027FB at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1321804138.13179.YahooMailClassic at web161804.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>



--- On Sun, 11/20/11, Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: (urth) Fwd: Babbiehorn?: Was: a sincere question mostly for roy
> To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net>
> Date: Sunday, November 20, 2011, 7:34 AM
> No dia 20/11/2011, ?s 14:56, David
> Stockhoff <dstockhoff at verizon.net>
> escreveu:
> 
> > On 11/20/2011 9:50 AM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote:
> >> No dia 20/11/2011, ?s 13:53, David
> Stockhoff<dstockhoff at verizon.net>?
> escreveu:
> >> 
> >>> On 11/19/2011 10:01 PM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques
> wrote:
> >>>> No dia 19/11/2011, ?s 21:03, David
> Stockhoff<dstockhoff at verizon.net>???escreveu:
> >>>> 
> >>>>> On 11/19/2011 3:54 PM, Marc Aramini
> wrote:
> >>>>>> I was reading shakespeare today
> and the term huswife came up, and I realized it was just a
> form of house: I think Babbie is like a spirit house.
> >>>>> Considering the references to houses,
> and that Wolfe originally wanted to use the name "hushog" (I
> don't know who pointed that out), meaning house-pig, I'd say
> that case is nailed shut. And it strengthens your idea that
> What was left of Horn went into Babbie,
> >>>> It gets me a bit miffed that people keep
> repeating this in disregard to the fact that Hide takes the
> time to mention the Rajan looks more like Horn in (some)
> dream travels than in real life.
> >>> So why don't you point out the passages? I
> haven't gotten there yet.
> >> I'll give you some more time, then.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > I guess I really don't understand when people get
> miffed at all. If you have counter-evidence or a
> counter-pattern in response to an identified pattern, voice
> it. Saying "evidence X strengthens theory Y" doesn't mean
> nothing else exists. I never said all of Horn is gone at the
> end of OBW and in fact have stated repeatedly that I think
> he is not all gone.
> 
> Marc thinks he's all gone and James thinks he was never
> there (fsvo 'was': apparently, sometimes James makes a point
> of saying he isn't there, others he makes of point of saying
> he is there in a way and it's all a bit cloudy anyhow).
> 
> _______________________________________________

Mostly gone, there is ALWAYS a residue after possession.  Now Silk is the dominant personality, but for all intents and purpose he has said goodbye and is only a memory in Silk.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net