Like a good Neighbor
James Wynn · 21 Nov 2011, 22:21
· from 2011-November.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:21:28 -0600 Subject: (urth) Like a good Neighbor In-Reply-To: <4ECACA39.8080702 at irit.fr> References: <1321817334.83564.YahooMailClassic at web161801.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <4EC95947.9000808 at irit.fr> <4ECA6D63.5030205 at verizon.net> <4ECA74F9.1080206 at gmail.com> <4ECA7D4E.80109 at verizon.net> <4ECACA39.8080702 at irit.fr> Message-ID: <4ECACEE8.8080303 at gmail.com> >> David Stockhoff wrote (21-11-2011 15:25): >> Why do you think a death here harms the story? On 11/21/2011 4:01 PM, Sergei SOLOVIEV wrote: > Because it is undermining his second "resurrection" - central to the > book - his spirit > passing into the body of Silk and guiding him to Blue. No. It only *necessarily* undermines a particular reading of that event. On the first reading, the audience assumes that Horn made it to Green and is then transported to Silk. But the narrator has said throughout the book that he horribly failed in his task. Understanding that Horn failed in his quest even before reaching Pajarocu. Just as we thought the narrator of LS was a omniscient narrator but turned out to be a couple of kids who went to Silk's school, we find out eventually the narrator of SS is not Horn but someone else. In this case, the second resurrection is caused to make sense because we realize that the Horn who went to Green, who negotiated with the Neighbors, is not human. A changeling has been inserted into the story. On 11/21/2011 4:06 PM, Sergei SOLOVIEV wrote: > I think Gerry is often in the role of "underdog" - you are many, and > it looks like (for a participant > who has no animosity or personal interest to take sides) you often > immediately > (and aggressively) support > each other just from friendship or whatever - Gerry is a provocative fellow. I have many times proclaimed that I just won't read is posts. I'm pretty sure I've read posts from both David and Lee that declare the same. But then I'll note that he has asked a really good question and I respond to. But it invariably comes to the fact that Gerry's approach to Wolfe is so alien to mine and so useless to mine, that he takes such open pleasure in being ornery, that every time I just kick myself for being engaged again. He's like a crazy girlfriend I once had.
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net