Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Like a good Neighbor

David Stockhoff · 22 Nov 2011, 14:39 · from 2011-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff)
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:39:26 -0500
Subject: (urth) Like a good Neighbor
In-Reply-To: <4ECB8BA2.4090308 at gmail.com>
References: <002001cca714$e3ec4b00$abcf4a0c@rclackey><4EC862F3.8090209 at gmail.com><5424B232-9800-407D-8ED3-02B9B7ED6861 at gmail.com><02D42C5978BB452092908DA0FA49188C@Rover><4EC9119D.8040706 at verizon.net><E1F6113BD66B4D258427765A09812968@Rover><4EC91904.1020306 at verizon.net>
	<8FF73CAE-81CA-474A-845E-9F1EC480F3AD at gmail.com>
	<7A74DAD511AF4AEF95743D75B5C8CA91@Rover>	<4ECA6921.5050501 at verizon.net>
	<4ECAC61A.1010107 at irit.fr> <4ECAC842.7010803 at gmail.com>
	<4ECB8A12.6000307 at irit.fr> <4ECB8BA2.4090308 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4ECBB41E.4030704 at verizon.net>

On 11/22/2011 6:46 AM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote:
> Sergei SOLOVIEV wrote (22-11-2011 11:40):
>> And if Horn completely died (departed) in the very end (after
>> Remora quoted the lines about Hyacinth), who (he or Silk) wanted
>> so much to call Seawrack - and why Silk (if only Silk remains)
>> departed with her? Did she replace in some way Hyacinth for
>> him? Why did she accept him, instead of Horn?
>
> I've asked this twice without reply. What's Seawrack doing with a 
> Rajan than has nothing of Horn in him - neither body nor soul? Yes, I 
> know, there's 'always' 'something' 'left' - but the point is we're 
> precisely discussing whether in the very end there's anything left.

I've asked the same question, more or less, not really expecting a 
reply. To put it another way: if, say, 10% of a mind is always left 
behind, is 10% enough?

Is it enough for some things (recognition) and not for others (speaking 
for humanity). It is probably not an entirely fair question, especially 
trying to quantify like that, but it needs at least a provisional answer.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net