Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Like a good neighbor

David Stockhoff · 23 Nov 2011, 15:23 · from 2011-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff)
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:23:06 -0500
Subject: (urth) Like a good neighbor
In-Reply-To: <1322060527.29691.YahooMailClassic at web161806.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
References: <1322060527.29691.YahooMailClassic at web161806.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <4ECD0FDA.2050900 at verizon.net>

On 11/23/2011 10:02 AM, Marc Aramini wrote:
> Also, I know I've said this before, but I really don't like the clone Typhon-Silk because it does complicate the four parents on the aureate path: we CAN identify them if Silk is a son and that fits the details better (assuming the final picture of Silk with his head on Typhon is one of ascension and apotheosis of a son overtaking the demiurge, which actually seems a bit gnostic, no?).  The details of the text are also better fitted with Tussah as a being distinct from Typhon, honestly. There are no dream sequences equating them in the way that Mamelta/Hy/Kypris/Chenille are equated.  The best evidence for cloning is found in statements like "Pas grew himself from a seed" and the idea of a nightside and regular Silk, but the particulars of the text make it much more tenable to identify the parents if we are dealing with a son, which is, as Lemur said, what Typhon wanted to replace him.

Is it impossible to equate a clone with a son? After all, if you or I 
cloned ourselves, we would raise the result as a son. All we'd be doing 
is cutting out the middle, er, middlewoman (at least her genetic 
contribution). We wouldn't expect this son to be identical to us---he'd 
have different parents, a different history, scars, everything. Was 
Athena not the daughter of Zeus?

If this semantic distinction causes such a problem, why not just let it go?

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net