Like a good Neighbor

Marc Aramini · 23 Nov 2011, 20:02 · from 2011-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: marcaramini at yahoo.com (Marc Aramini)
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:02:28 -0800 (PST)
Subject: (urth) Like a good Neighbor
In-Reply-To: <4ECD49B1.60609 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1322078548.18583.YahooMailClassic at web161802.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>



--- On Wed, 11/23/11, James Wynn <crushtv at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: James Wynn <crushtv at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: (urth) Like a good Neighbor
> To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net>
> Date: Wednesday, November 23, 2011, 11:29 AM
> 
> > Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:
> > OK, let's see if I can summarize this correctly. You
> believe that
> > 
> > (a) the Neighbors are sentient trees native to Blue,
> who can astrally
> > project into the form the Narrator meets;
> > 
> > (b) the inhumi are not-natively-sentient reptiles or
> amphibians native
> > to Green, who take on the nature of what they feed on
> (at least in
> > their offspring);
> > 
> > (c) because they fed on Neighbors, who are trees, the
> inhumi "take on"
> > a sort of tree-ishness and become lianas.
> > 
> > Is that correct?
> 
> Precisely correct except that "reptile" is an analogy. One
> should not assume a true reptile nature.
> 
> As the Rajan says:
> "These people, like people everywhere here, seem to fear
> that an inhumu may live on even with its head severed. That
> is not the case, of course; but I cannot help wondering how
> the superstition originated and became so widespread.
> Certainly the inhumi have no bones as we understand them.
> Possibly their skeletons are cartilage, as those of some
> sea-creatures are. On Green, Geier maintained that the
> inhumi are akin to slugs and leeches. No one, I believe,
> took him seriously; yet it is certain that once dead they
> decay very quickly, though they are difficult to kill and
> can survive for weeks and even months without the blood that
> is their only food. "
> ~ OBW chapter 4
> 
> Additionally, the Rajan notes that there is a general
> belief that inhumi can survive even after decapitation. He
> asserts that this is not true, but ponders how it came to be
> so generally believed. This might be reference to the
> Rajan's lianna staff that (it is implied) is still sentient.
> Additionally, HePenSheep says that the Neighbors fires are
> burning liannas.
> _______________________________________________

I think this is confusing chicken and egg, honestly.  ontogeny recapitulates philogeny: the reptile stage of evolution shows that in the past they fed on reptiles before becoming man feeders, but the "being buried and not dying" etc is a function of their vinish origin.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net