modernism
Alice Turner · 26 Oct 1999, 10:23
· from urth-v0028.mbox · original
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: "Alice Turner" <akt at attglobal.net> Subject: (urth) modernism Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 10:23:06 Message-ID: <urth-v0028-0242 at digest.urth.net> X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0028/0242.shtml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > From: "Daniel Fusch" <dfusch at hotmail.com> > I think Wolfe's work is likely to last into the next century, although it is > unlikely that he will receive much in the way of critical attention for some > time to come. I think the work of writers like Walter A. Miller, Jr., Ray > Bradbury, and Ursula K. LeGuin will also last into posterity, since they are > also authors who experiment with different forms of storytelling. These > authors are also--incidentally--taught in today's college lit classes. Bradbury and LeGuin will last as children's authors. Miller will last for people interested in the history of SF (as Bradbury and LeGuin will too, of course--the way Sheridan LeFanu has lasted). > And I think it very likely that some of the science fiction "classics" will > last as "relics" of the past...at least for a little while. For example, > Asimov's "Foundation" is probably here to stay, whether or not we agree with > its "literary merit" (if such a thing can be defined), since that work > defined a generation of speculative literature. I would rather watch 24 successive viewings of "Eyes Wide Shut" than have to read the Foundation trilogy again, which is not only abysmally written but also has one of stupidest premises ever concocted. But chacun a son gout. Certain films--"Things to > Come" and "2001: A Space Odyssey"--will be a matter of speculation > throughout the ages; "Things to Come" remains a frequent film for British > lit courses even sixty years after its first appearance. I've never seen "Things to Come." Agree about "2001," for several reasons, one of which is that it is as pure a relic of the 60s as "Sgt. Pepper." > So I don't think Wolfe is the only writer who will survive. Of course, in > centuries to come, who knows who will remain? Homer's work, after all, comes > to us completely isolated from its literary tradition. Oh, I never meant that! I was making a point about his encompassing the big pulp traditions with these series, using every bit of the familiar cliches but making them into something bigger and richer so that readers to come could somehow absorb the 20th c. tradition without having to wade through the innumerable precursors. [snip on Melville] > I think "The Book of the New Sun" is like this, also. Wolfe presents us with > a romance (or a fantasy, if you prefer the modern time), in which a > torturer's apprentice becomes a king. This is a very familiar, conventional > plot--the tailor who becomes a prince, the girl with the ash-covered face > who marries the prince, the pauper who becomes king, etc. But the narration > is modernist, experimental. Well, yes; that was more or less my point. > It is difficult to label "The Book of the New Sun" that easily, however. One > must keep in mind that it fits within many traditions. It is a heroic > romance, it is a mythopoeic work, it is a modernist work, and it is also a > work of science fiction. Maybe assigning one label to the book would deprive > it of its totality--would allow us to look at only one part of the whole. > That, of course, is a distinctly modernist thought. =3D) Would back you up. > To drop another axiom, forewarned is forearmed.... Like Popeye? -alga *More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net