Like a good Neighbor

James Wynn · 24 Nov 2011, 05:21 · from 2011-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn)
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 23:21:28 -0600
Subject: (urth) Like a good Neighbor
In-Reply-To: <SNT123-W2405234AB343245B6904DBCFCE0 at phx.gbl>
References: <SNT123-W2405234AB343245B6904DBCFCE0 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <A50D3BAA-7D16-48FC-A488-9C705A8CD99F at gmail.com>

Looks to me like someone's inhumi roommate left town without kicking in on his half of the rent.

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 23, 2011, at 10:21 PM, Lee Berman <severiansola at hotmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 
>> David Stockhoff: I'm not arguing for anything but its plausibility. I think it's a cool 
>> idea. I WANT to believe ... !
> 
> 
> 
> I know you do! Argh! LMAO, I swear I am going to throw a hissy fit tantrum on this. 
> 
> 
> 
> No, NO, NO!! It isn't plausible. Only the "dry, waterless husk body" scenario would
> 
> allow this sort of space travel. It isn't only temperature but also a matter of internal
> 
> cellular pressure. But the effort it would take to launch Inhumi from a planet would 
> 
> require muscular action. Gerry's rotisserie chicken spinning to catch the sun's radiation 
> 
> evenly would also require muscular action. Muscles cannot work without water-filled cells and
> 
> those cannot exist in the void.
> 
> 
> 
> I can see debating possibilities for fun. But not plausibility. There isn't any. As an 
> 
> effective Wolfe reader one *MUST* become aware of the lies of unreliable narrators. And the
> 
> inhumi are as unreliable as any narrator in any Wolfe story. This is our responsibility.
> 
> Let's not shirk it! ;- ).
> 
> 
> 
>> For me, the most compelling argument would be that inhumi do not 
>> see---or at least are not blinded---in the human visual spectrum. Krait 
>> says.....
> 
> 
> 
> Stop right there! There is not the slightest chance of a compelling argument here once the 
> 
> words, "Krait says.." appears. You know this! (you acknowledge this) But still you want to
> 
> believe the Great Deceivers and their pleasant, interesting, "cool" lies.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> (He could be lying, but if so the inhumi have a whole ad campaign worked 
>> out, complete with talking points to insert into unrelated 
>> conversations. Which is entirely possible.)
> 
> 
> 
> It is a veritable certainty. The campaign goes by the label of the great secret of the Inhumi.
> 
> SilkHorn has promised them he would not reveal it to us. And he does not. He even provides the
> 
> boondoggle of "You are what you eat" as their secret to show solidarity with any lying inhumi
> 
> who happen to read (or have read to them) the text.
> 
> 
> 
> But what Silkhorn does is provide the discerning reader with the means to determine what the 
> 
> real Inhumi secret is. This allows him to support the good guys against the bad guys without
> 
> breaking his vow. Wolfe's science may not be perfect in his stories but it is damn good. Far,
> 
> far too good to allow naked biological bodies to perform extended flight in the void.
> 
> 
> 
> (believe the inhumi and I've got an Iraq invasion to sell you, complete with yellowcake uranium,
> 
> hundreds of Iraqi nuclear warheads and 9/11 planned by Saddam Hussein ;-))                         
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net