Pike's Ghost

Marc Aramini · 27 Nov 2011, 21:27 · from 2011-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: marcaramini at yahoo.com (Marc Aramini)
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 13:27:10 -0800 (PST)
Subject: (urth) Pike's Ghost
In-Reply-To: <SNT123-W151D650A1B6C93609E14E4CFCD0 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <1322429230.81138.YahooMailClassic at web161806.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>

--- On Sun, 11/27/11, Lee Berman <severiansola at hotmail.com> wrote:

>>  
> 
> I think your reasoning is spot on, larry. If Wolfe wanted
> us to think
> 
> of Typhon as a normal, Commonwealthy sort of human he would
> have been 
> 
> given a saint name. Other non-human aliens are given Roman
> names like
> 
> Inire, Cumaean, Barbatus and Famulimus. Alien monsters are
> given monster 
> 
> names from mythology like Abaia, Erebus and Scylla. Why
> should Typhon not 
> 
> follow the same rules?
> 
>  

The only thing here is that he is from pre-conciliator times (as was Jonas) so it is not clear whether his alien name is indicative of his nature or the time he was named and alive.  Admittedly, Jonas was not entirely organic, but his OT name is distinct from the saint's names, so the naming system on pre-conciliator relics and leftovers like Typhon (who could have even assumed the name in his pretension to godhood as he ascended to temporal authority) is a wee bit ambiguous.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net