Pike's ghost

James Wynn · 29 Nov 2011, 00:29 · from 2011-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn)
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:29:34 -0600
Subject: (urth) Pike's ghost
In-Reply-To: <4ED41F91.1020906 at gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W32DE1E1E63A572375FA831CFB20 at phx.gbl>	<70C71EDFDC3B4AEBA0FD38FD41FB8551@Rover>	<4ED39725.9090804 at gmail.com>	<4ED3ABE8.8060807 at verizon.net>	<4ED3BEAA.1080107 at gmail.com>	<4ED3CB92.40502 at verizon.net>	<4ED3D4DC.3000409 at gmail.com>	<4ED3DFF2.8050208 at verizon.net>	<4ED3F57B.8050104 at gmail.com>
	<4ED40796.8030108 at verizon.net>	<4ED41277.9040204 at gmail.com>
	<4ED41B0E.6050507 at gmail.com> <4ED41F91.1020906 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4ED4276E.8040608 at gmail.com>

On 11/28/2011 5:56 PM, Ant?nio Marques wrote:
>> On 11/28/2011 5:00 PM, Ant?nio Marques wrote:
>>> - You (as many others) often like to assert "there's no reason to
>>> believe X" when in fact it's merely that "though the odds are for X,
>>> it may well be otherwise".
>>
>> Unfortunately, there are no odds-makers in literary criticism. Perhaps
>> you mean "though THERE ARE REASONS for X, it may well be otherwise".
>> Everybody thinks his theory is the most likely.
>
> This isn't about theories. This is about when something looks like a 
> duck and quacks like a duck.

If it is you own theory, it always quacks.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net