Pike's ghost

Gerry Quinn · 29 Nov 2011, 15:23 · from 2011-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: gerry at bindweed.com (Gerry Quinn)
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:23:57 -0000
Subject: (urth) Pike's ghost
In-Reply-To: <4ED3DFF2.8050208 at verizon.net>
References: <SNT123-W32DE1E1E63A572375FA831CFB20 at phx.gbl><70C71EDFDC3B4AEBA0FD38FD41FB8551@Rover>	<4ED39725.9090804 at gmail.com><4ED3ABE8.8060807 at verizon.net>
	<4ED3BEAA.1080107 at gmail.com><4ED3CB92.40502 at verizon.net>
	<4ED3D4DC.3000409 at gmail.com> <4ED3DFF2.8050208 at verizon.net>
Message-ID: <C855128C5DE34B5B85EC57DE2F5C9EC1@Rover>



From: David Stockhoff 
> On 11/28/2011 1:37 PM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote:

> > Where does any assumption ever come from? If Pas was created from 
> > Typhon, any difference between them would need a rationale. Not having 
> > an obvious one, it isn't impossible, but it's the less likely option.

> Now, don't you know what asserting assumptions makes out of you and me?

> If you frequently run into clones who look exactly like their originals, 
> that would be a good answer. If you don't, then on what do you base your 
> assumption?
Don?t we all?  Identical twins are clones.
- Gerry Quinn
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20111129/ba70fa34/attachment.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net