Pike's ghost

David Stockhoff · 29 Nov 2011, 17:40 · from 2011-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff)
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:40:37 -0500
Subject: (urth) Pike's ghost
In-Reply-To: <4ED517DE.9000901 at gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W32DE1E1E63A572375FA831CFB20 at phx.gbl>
	<70C71EDFDC3B4AEBA0FD38FD41FB8551@Rover>	<4ED39725.9090804 at gmail.com>
	<4ED3ABE8.8060807 at verizon.net>	<4ED3BEAA.1080107 at gmail.com>
	<4ED3CB92.40502 at verizon.net>	<4ED3D4DC.3000409 at gmail.com>
	<4ED3DFF2.8050208 at verizon.net>	<4ED3F57B.8050104 at gmail.com>
	<4ED40796.8030108 at verizon.net>	<4ED41277.9040204 at gmail.com>
	<4ED41B0E.6050507 at gmail.com>	<4ED41F91.1020906 at gmail.com>
	<4ED4276E.8040608 at gmail.com>	<4ED4293C.2010906 at gmail.com>
	<4ED50482.8030804 at gmail.com>	<4ED5064C.8000004 at gmail.com>
	<4ED50A58.7080100 at gmail.com>	<4ED50C1A.2060103 at gmail.com>
	<CAJ8=rtjkwZ24kJeM1zO9FUxq2YyGdoK-13-Gc59JL_bwyqmE4g at mail.gmail.com>
	<4ED50F7E.3060400 at gmail.com> <4ED51266.7070507 at gmail.com>
	<4ED517DE.9000901 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4ED51915.6040706 at verizon.net>

On 11/29/2011 12:35 PM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote:
> James Wynn wrote (29-11-2011 17:12):
>>
>>>
>>>>>> Why do you believe enlightenment came to Patera Silk in the ball 
>>>>>> court?
>>>>
>>>>> Because the text says so.
>>>>
>>>> Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:
>>>> Which means that Horn and Nettle say so. To what extent may we rely
>>>> upon their interpretation of this event?
>>>
>>> Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote:
>>> And to what extent may we rely on their assertion that they wrote LS?
>>> And to what extent may we rely on their actual existence?
>>> Come to think of it, it may well be the case that all those stories are
>>> the product of someone's imagination.
>>
>> Antonio, what do you suppose the point was in having Horn and Nettle 
>> write
>> the story as opposed to an omniscient third-person narrator?
>
> What do you base your theory that it was Horn and Nettle on? There's 
> no real reason to believe it. It may have been Marrow's slave.

Aren't you now doing what you just told us you can't stand?

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net