Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Pike's ghost

David Stockhoff · 30 Nov 2011, 14:26 · from 2011-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:26:50 -0500
Subject: (urth) Pike's ghost
In-Reply-To: <1322631490.25296.YahooMailNeo at web114714.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
References: <SNT123-W67AD0CB4BFD6D632EECA6CFB30 at phx.gbl>
	<1322547833.19876.YahooMailNeo at web114719.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
	<4ED4E975.4030303 at verizon.net>
	<1322631490.25296.YahooMailNeo at web114714.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <4ED63D2A.1060907 at verizon.net>

On 11/30/2011 12:38 AM, Jerry Friedman wrote:
>> From: David Stockhoff<dstockhoff at verizon.net>
>>
>> Sorry, what's the Levi quotation?
>
> This sentence from the occultist Eliphas Levi, which I'd quoted earlier.
>
> "Some alchemists, impressed by this idea, speculated on the culture of
> the mandragore, and experimented in the artificial reproduction of a
> soil sufficiently fruitful and a sun sufficiently active to humanise the said root, and thus create men without the concurrence of the female."

thanks!

"A sun sufficiently active to humanize...." What a suggestive line.
>> Why don't they point to Ymar?  The two Biblical references to mandrakes are in connection with Rachel and
>> the maiden in the Song of Songs, both types of the Virgin Mary in Catholic theology (or I can find at least one
>> source that says that about each one).  I don't think I need to make the last connection.
>
>> Actually, please do.
> The last connection is that Ymar is an anagram of Mary.

d'oh!
>
>> I don't follow this or know the references at
>      all. Why Ymar? (I did just find the Rachel ones but don;t know how
>      to interpret them.)
>
>
> Just disagreeing with Lee's comment that the word "mandragora" could only point to Typhon.  I don't think any of these word games /necessarily/ point to one thing.  You can always find connections to others.  Of course, you and Lee and others may have reasons for preferring one connection.
>
>
> I meant to add that "mandragora" can suggest "dragoman".  Agia and the jungle guide might both count as dragomans.  Maybe some people will like a possible connection between the mandragora and Father Inire.

I'm pretty "catholic" in my tastes when it comes to connections.
>>> Or why not the Sleeper?  Shakespeare refers to mandragora as a soporific, including in a fairly famous passage from /Othello/.
>> Meaning "the sleepers" on the Whorl? Or another sleeper?
>
> I was thinking of the god worshiped on Ushas under that name, but any one you want.

Ah. Perhaps.

The quote:

Not poppy, nor mandragora,
Nor all the drowsy syrups of the world,
Shall ever medicine thee to that sweet sleep
Which thou owedst yesterday.
Othello, 3. 3
>>> Or Severian in his first life or two?  The most famous quotation about a mandrake starts "Go and catch a falling star", which immediately brings to mind the slingers' song, which Wolfe said illuminates--darkly--Severian's past and future.
>> This quotation?:
>>
>> ?Go, and catch a falling star, / Get with child a mandrake root, / Tell me, where all past years are, / Or who cleft the Devil's foot.?
>>   John Donne quotes(English poet, 1572-1631)
> Great lines, and of course Severian finds out where past years are.  Other connections can easily be made.  But I can't say whether Wolfe had it mind or not.
>
>
>> Not necessarily.  Maybe we're meant to leave it as a mystery and concentrate on the interaction between Severian and the homunculus.
>> I agree. But the Donne quote, if it is a key link, does lead to the image of impregnating a mandrake root, which takes us back to who and why, and what resulted from it.
>>
>>
>> Oddly enough, it doesn't take me to those questions at all.

Does it at least take you back to Levi?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20111130/207aa0e0/attachment.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net