Gummed-Up Works or Got Lives?

Antonin Scriabin · 13 Dec 2011, 16:56 · from 2011-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: kierkegaurdian at gmail.com (Antonin Scriabin)
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:56:14 -0500
Subject: (urth) Gummed-Up Works or Got Lives?
In-Reply-To: <20111213164613.30232.qmail at server281.com>
References: <20111213164613.30232.qmail at server281.com>
Message-ID: <CAM0v-i6AOcERnP_dUq7jZmhEBcNyMvXKH9VoGO2oGSEMdZHiTw at mail.gmail.com>

I vote for gummed-up works.

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Brian <brian at studiobl.com> wrote:

> ...Just wondering if that Linked-In request somehow threw the server for a
> loop, resulting in the lapse in activity. ...or if people actually have
> real lives and it's close to Christmas...
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20111213/7f6fe8f8/attachment.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net