Gummed-Up Works or Got Lives?

António Pedro Marques · 16 Dec 2011, 12:40 · from 2011-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QW50w7NuaW8gUGVkcm8gTWFycXVlcw==?=)
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:40:02 +0000
Subject: (urth) Gummed-Up Works or Got Lives?
In-Reply-To: <4EEAB8C6.100 at verizon.net>
References: <SNT123-W50A9FF8908A2C4EB5FA2CACFA30 at phx.gbl><37C4859FAD55407DBA8779047C8C609B@Rover>
	<4EEAA211.7070705 at verizon.net>
	<6A0F475423584142B0FA666A0E93F682@Rover> <4EEAB8C6.100 at verizon.net>
Message-ID: <4EEB3C22.6060904 at gmail.com>

Look, David, we're all interested in reading what you have to say about 
fairies, magic, the otherworld, literary tradition and, yes, the structure 
of argumentation. I think it would be far more worthwhile if, whenever you 
get the feeling the other bloke doesn't master one of those subjects, you'd 
elaborate on it (the subject).

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net