Gummed-Up Works or Got Lives?
António Pedro Marques · 16 Dec 2011, 12:48
· from 2011-December.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: entonio at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QW50w7NuaW8gUGVkcm8gTWFycXVlcw==?=) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:48:28 +0000 Subject: (urth) Gummed-Up Works or Got Lives? In-Reply-To: <CAGB0RZ5ULO3ELz5926E0y+7QiaOjEGFLAxVnEyu3y7yNZ01A1Q at mail.gmail.com> References: <SNT123-W19F0448B0071FDE9EE535FCFA30 at phx.gbl> <AF090B8029664A21BCF883AA293C7940@Rover> <4EEA0B98.7020802 at gmail.com> <1323962239.90026.YahooMailNeo at web121002.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <CAGB0RZ5ULO3ELz5926E0y+7QiaOjEGFLAxVnEyu3y7yNZ01A1Q at mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4EEB3E1C.1080706 at gmail.com> Daniel Petersen wrote (16-12-2011 11:23): > Dang it. This thread totally got away from me. Since I started the current > genre discussion with a comment to the effect that BotNS has a 'feel' of SnS > (at first), let me just remind those who saw that comment that I rather > clearly said that this is just a feel and NOT that the series IS SnS (in > whole or in part). I still think I'm right that it has a significant SnS > genre element in some of its contours - at least for a while. I was the one who replied to that, and I was not saying you were saying that it WAS s&s. I was saying I didn't get even the surface feeling of s&s from it. I get more of it from The Malacia Tapestry or Lord Valentine's Castle. That's not anyone's fault. Maybe for me s&s is a more restricted thing than for others. I think of Conan the Barbarian rather than LotR as the prototype. I'm not even sure I find LotR all that s&s, given the serious 'historical' feeling I get from it, nor the Hobbit, given its (deceivingly) children's-tale style.
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net