instant new fan

Larry Miller · 19 Dec 2011, 19:02 · from 2011-December.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: decanus1284 at gmail.com (Larry Miller)
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:02:02 -0500
Subject: (urth) instant new fan
In-Reply-To: <CAM0v-i6iXDODVAMOzwhsHjS642YoWqCABL7X6ov0OgNnWCkF3Q at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGB0RZ6mYQHLv4cGAGXiwkC85RCNo2+7=uD1Am1NiwZZkeSizA at mail.gmail.com>
	<4EEEB67B.8060306 at verizon.net>
	<CAGB0RZ5nzkCJ9tnQdhKizw6mTyw19tHKLj5eKqe-Z0q2YO-UMA at mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM0v-i6qxbBxid5V-xj0qzpKq47Obcm6hWaHOdo+DE1veB6FwA at mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGB0RZ64PQoAROvTqLzvb0MHXh6=CDs41qfGznWtiz5TnSz0HQ at mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM0v-i5AY2TiTy2BSKNse7HaTOWpYmGMC1Y=dLVCVomMPfA_9g at mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGB0RZ7OVDRUxCAjXS9VOYw3dMb11+CGCaADasDeZ+1CRyzcfA at mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ8=rtjHASVz7ba6n+34NnOYHWGX+EysEESaBkv1ejyPh0oW8g at mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM0v-i6iXDODVAMOzwhsHjS642YoWqCABL7X6ov0OgNnWCkF3Q at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CADQR0Gqkja_=n30WqeX7Wm_ODku1rdRbss1QDCZXzUkYpdUDuw at mail.gmail.com>

Snow Crash is also good IMHO a better cyberpunk novel than any of
Gibsons recent works.  The Diamond Age is also a great book, probably
my favorite book of his so far.

On 12/19/11, Antonin Scriabin <kierkegaurdian at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have yet to read *Anathem *(sitting on my shelf as we speak), but I would
> highly recommend his *Baroque Cycle* and the related book, *Cryptonomicon*.
> He is a very snappy writer, and is one of the few I have come across who
> can make a 1,000 page novel just whiz by.  Lots of fireworks and
> excitement; he said in an interview not too long ago that he is first and
> foremost concerned with writing "a good yarn".
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes <danldo at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Daniel, if you want to check out Stephenson, I would recommend
>> starting with "Anathem," a book of deep secrets.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Daniel Petersen
>> <danielottojackpetersen at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Oh yes, Antonin: happens to me all the time.  Dan Simmons, for example,
>> > writes a very compelling yard in perfectly capable prose.  But if I read
>> him
>> > too close to an immersive reading of Wolfe, I'll find myself distactedly
>> > pining for Wolfean prose.  And, as you say, once I'm into the swing of
>> any
>> > good writer's less-than-the-Wolfean-ideal prose, I thoroughly enjoy
>> myself.
>> >  (I've been planning to check out Stephenson for some time.)
>> >
>> > -DOJP
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Antonin Scriabin <
>> kierkegaurdian at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Daniel, I understand what you mean about the prose being so good it
>> >> kind
>> >> of slips under the radar, and "does its job".  I read Neal Stephenson's
>> >> Quicksilver and absolutely loved it, then read Shadow and Claw, which I
>> >> loved even more.  Then I went back to read Stephenson's The Confusion,
>> and
>> >> it felt like I had really, really stepped down a notch.  I didn't
>> realize
>> >> how good the prose in New Sun was until I read something else; then it
>> hit
>> >> me how incredibly well Wolfe can write.
>> >>
>> >> P.S. I feel like I should mention that The Confusion, once I got back
>> into
>> >> the swing of that story, ended up being one of my favorite "adventure"
>> >> novels.  I highly recommend it!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Daniel Petersen
>> >> <danielottojackpetersen at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> You know, it's funny.  The first chapters of SotT did *not* terribly
>> >>> impress me as to writing style when I first tackled BotNS over a
>> decade ago.
>> >>>  There was nothing *wrong* with them at all - flawless grammar and
>> syntax
>> >>> and what have you.  The story itself and its themes began to sweep me
>> up as
>> >>> the book really got going, but it wasn't until later in the book or
>> series
>> >>> that the writing itself began to leap out at me as really exquisite
>> prose.
>> >>>
>> >>> Plus, sometimes I wonder if even the writing style itself is 'hidden
>> >>> in
>> >>> plain sight' from the reader along with so much else.  The writing is
>> *so*
>> >>> good (grammatical and graceful as Wolfe recommends to aspiring
>> writers) that
>> >>> it just ends up doing its job so effectively that you don't always
>> notice it
>> >>> until you're quite some way into a work.
>> >>>
>> >>> Also, I'll here mention that I love the quality of prose in Long and
>> >>> Short Suns just as much as New Sun.  It's just doing something totally
>> >>> different than Severian's baroque machinations.
>> >>>
>> >>> -DOJP
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Antonin Scriabin
>> >>> <kierkegaurdian at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Wolfe's writing is very beautiful, and he uses such vivid, unique
>> >>>> language.  I haven't memorized the passage, but the part in The
>> Shadow of
>> >>>> the Torturer where Ultan is describing the different books in the
>> library;
>> >>>> wonderful!  That together with the nearby Book of Gold passage really
>> made
>> >>>> me fall in love with that book in particular and Wolfe in general.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Daniel Petersen
>> >>>> <danielottojackpetersen at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Yes, so many truly wonderful lines and passages.  I remember loving
>> the
>> >>>>> really robust mountainous language at the beginning of SotL,
>> starting with
>> >>>>> the sentence:  'Thrax is a crooked dagger entering the heart of the
>> >>>>> mountains.'
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> You know, I don't think I've ever seen Wolfe's writing (as in style
>> or
>> >>>>> tone or texture of prose, etc.) discussed on this list.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> -DOJP
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:58 AM, David Stockhoff
>> >>>>> <dstockhoff at verizon.net> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On 12/18/2011 7:59 PM, Daniel Petersen wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Thought people here might enjoy seeing that new readers are still
>> >>>>>>> discovering Wolfe for the very first time and being instantly
>> enchanted.  A
>> >>>>>>> friend of mine (an aspiring writer) who loves Tolkien and China
>> Mieville
>> >>>>>>> finally, at my persistent insistence, obtained BotNS and posted
>> this to me
>> >>>>>>> on Facebook just now about what he's read so far:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> 'I love the languid, ivy-wrapped prose that Wolfe writes in. I've
>> >>>>>>> been discovering that this is a style I find myself entranced by
>> when I read
>> >>>>>>> it. I was not long ago working through Titus Groan and found
>> >>>>>>> myself
>> >>>>>>> ensconced by many of the same elements that I'm loving in Wolfe's
>> writing.
>> >>>>>>> Mr. Wolfe seems much better at marrying plot and poesy than Mr.
>> Peake,
>> >>>>>>> however.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I'm very excited about what waits around the corner. BotNS seems
>> like
>> >>>>>>> the kind of novel I dream of writing.'
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Some pretty apt comments, I thought.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> -DOJP
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Cool!
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> BNS has some of the most gorgeous lines I have ever read. There are
>> >>>>>> many others, but I think most often of the description of lotuses
>> on Gyoll
>> >>>>>> in CotA immediately after Maxellindis's uncle's talk of what appear
>> to be
>> >>>>>> the legions of Erebus:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> With that he fell silent, looking out over the nenuphars. We were
>> well
>> >>>>>> above that part of
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Gyoll opposite the Citadel, but they were still packed more densely
>> >>>>>> than wildflowers in
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> any meadow this side of paradise.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> This kind of mood/content juxtaposition enraptures me.
>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>> Urth Mailing List
>> >>>>>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> >>>>>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>> Urth Mailing List
>> >>>>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> >>>>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> Urth Mailing List
>> >>>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> >>>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Urth Mailing List
>> >>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> >>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Urth Mailing List
>> >> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> >> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Urth Mailing List
>> > To post, write urth at urth.net
>> > Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dan'l Danehy-Oakes
>> _______________________________________________
>> Urth Mailing List
>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>
>
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net