Urth Net

← back to the conversation

instant new fan

David Stockhoff · 20 Dec 2011, 00:13 · from 2011-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff)
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:13:28 -0500
Subject: (urth) instant new fan
In-Reply-To: <1324338033.45909.YahooMailNeo at web114706.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
References: <CAGB0RZ6mYQHLv4cGAGXiwkC85RCNo2+7=uD1Am1NiwZZkeSizA at mail.gmail.com>
	<4EEEB67B.8060306 at verizon.net>
	<CAGB0RZ5nzkCJ9tnQdhKizw6mTyw19tHKLj5eKqe-Z0q2YO-UMA at mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM0v-i6qxbBxid5V-xj0qzpKq47Obcm6hWaHOdo+DE1veB6FwA at mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGB0RZ64PQoAROvTqLzvb0MHXh6=CDs41qfGznWtiz5TnSz0HQ at mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM0v-i5AY2TiTy2BSKNse7HaTOWpYmGMC1Y=dLVCVomMPfA_9g at mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGB0RZ7OVDRUxCAjXS9VOYw3dMb11+CGCaADasDeZ+1CRyzcfA at mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ8=rtjHASVz7ba6n+34NnOYHWGX+EysEESaBkv1ejyPh0oW8g at mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM0v-i6iXDODVAMOzwhsHjS642YoWqCABL7X6ov0OgNnWCkF3Q at mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGB0RZ6Z_Lw245Mz8W3tFYq1yXnLxoRzjEEDm+BfAWMckguXBA at mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ8=rtgaRc6tuAJWgApw7OeZEcV-eo-T0dzTB9q3mx3HpNFdnw at mail.gmail.com>
	<1324338033.45909.YahooMailNeo at web114706.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <4EEFD328.4030504 at verizon.net>

On 12/19/2011 6:40 PM, Jerry Friedman wrote:
> From: Dan'l Danehy-Oakes<danldo at gmail.com>
>> Daniel Petersen wrote:
>>> Looking forward to taking a big
>>> bite out of his oeuvre, but, recommendations notwithstanding, I'm still
>>> totally puzzled about how best to begin to tackle its voluminous bulk!
>> You could do worse than to start at the beginning. _Snow Crash_ is a
>> very funny book, if you can deal with the kind of humor that names a
>> book's main character "Hiro Protagonist." Others really like _The
>> Diamond Age_, but it didn't do much for me. I recommend going to the
>> recent _Anathem_, a dark alternate-world novel.
> Actually, /The Big U/ was the first. I found it intermittently amusing, but a lot of people didn't find it amusing at all. I second the recommendation to start with /Snow Crash/.  I haven't read /Anathem/, and I agree with Dan'l about /The Diamond Age/.
>   
> On Antonin's comment, I'm both a Gibson and a Stephenson person, though I like /Neuromancer/ better than anything by Stephenson that I've read.  Likewise I like both /The Lord of the Rings/ and /Bored of the Rings/, though I haven't reread the latter since I was a teenager.

Snow Crash and Diamond Age both seemed to me like skilled but hollow 
attempts to accomplish obvious goals. As though a teacher had assigned 
the writing of novels with certain plot points, topics, elements ... a 
feeling one sometimes gets from computer games.

His short story more or less set in the same world as Diamond Age was 
brilliant, however. And I loved the hoplite officer.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net