Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Agia's Weapons

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 21 Dec 2011, 16:43 · from 2011-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: danldo at gmail.com (Dan'l Danehy-Oakes)
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:43:23 -0800
Subject: (urth) Agia's Weapons
In-Reply-To: <SNT123-W493665E916D7D55EF777FFCFA50 at phx.gbl>
References: <SNT123-W493665E916D7D55EF777FFCFA50 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <CAJ8=rtiboJH2qMvMBbqbWv+TJzubCBPcoaiBWWnWN2s0ykxAuw at mail.gmail.com>

Lee Berman wrote:

> I am proposing that what WOlfe has done is take one (very large) character and
> split it into various sub-characters. The synecdoche of this is Tzadkiel who appears in guises
> as varied as hairy blob, monkey, troglodyte, adonis-man, giant serious angel and little laughing
> fairy. Compared to that, are Inire and Hethor (and others) really so different?

The problem here is that you're trying to solve a puzzle in tBotNS
with information that only became available in tUotNS. Wolfe is a
deeply puzzling writer, but he deploys his clues fairly, and when he
wrote tBotNS he had no intention of writing tUotNS - it was not yet a
gleam in David Hartwell's eye. Thus, there would be no way for a
reader to make this analogy; the _Book_ proper has no such
transformations in it (that I recall).

I don't buy it.

-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net