S&S vs. SF in BotNS
David Stockhoff · 21 Dec 2011, 21:03
· from 2011-December.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 16:03:42 -0500 Subject: (urth) S&S vs. SF in BotNS In-Reply-To: <1324498759.21606.YahooMailNeo at web114711.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <SNT123-W7526AC06DCF8B44AA065BCFA40 at phx.gbl> <1324430592.14044.YahooMailNeo at web114714.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4EF15A79.9030900 at clueland.com> <4EF1D955.6090700 at verizon.net> <1324498759.21606.YahooMailNeo at web114711.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <4EF249AE.4050709 at verizon.net> On 12/21/2011 3:19 PM, Jerry Friedman wrote: >> >Ultan's remarks are key, although I think they do not refer only to the analeptic alzabo but to larger concepts of interest to Severian and Wolfe. At any rate, the principle of what you might call "spiritual cannibalism" already exists---that is, the pre-scientific concept that when you eat the seat of your dead enemy's soul, you eat his soul. Any further details will be particular to the genre, setting, or audience---in our case, "plausible" science. >> > >> >In addition, if the brain is so potent, there was plenty of Thecla's to go around the table in thimblefuls. That would seem to make eating the body redundant, but it's easy to construct a social/ritual/magical explanation for this that would be acceptable to the Vodalarii, or to imagine that the feast was so much more, as a sensual or even as a bonding experience, than a simple injection of cells/RNA to acquire memories. The presentation of the body alone suggests a cultural significance on the level of a spectacular wedding feast. > > But then why do we have to imagine it, and why the red herring of Severian's and Ultan's interchange about the corpse's hands, as Jeff mentioned above? If Wolfe had wanted us to think of this as science fiction, he could easily have restricted the whole thing to brains, which would indeed have been licensed by the RNA and planaria beliefs of the time and by the reference to holography, another sf cliche back then (though not tremendously compatible with the RNA theory). He seems to undercut this deliberately by implying that the memory is in the whole body, when we know perfectly well that injuries that don't interfere with brain function don't affect the memory. First, Wolfe undercuts everything he does. Rather than repeat himself, he throws out a data point that is near another one. He also likes to parrot historical concepts, especially commonsense ones that are probably wrong, whether they explain things or not. I think he truly enjoys imagining what the world would be like if it actually ran the way we think it does. When he has Latro see gods, he doesn't mock the Greeks but rather ourselves, including our inability to see miracles. Second, I think the remarks about hands have to do with how the universe (and the Increate) works as a whole. It's a clue about how Yesod manages Briah, for example, and Tzadkiel. Third, did Wolfe want us to think BNS was SF? If so, he failed. He had Vodalus give a feast in a scene that contains no SF whatsoever, and gave us enough contradictory theory about the process that we would not know what to expect when the moment came for actual practice. (Science is supposed to predict!) And when the time comes for the real thing with the old Autarch, the ritual's brutal simplicity reveals that feast as orgiastic and hollow pageantry in comparison.
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net