S&S vs. SF in BotNS

António Pedro Marques · 22 Dec 2011, 12:30 · from 2011-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QW50w7NuaW8gUGVkcm8gTWFycXVlcw==?=)
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:30:22 +0000
Subject: (urth) S&S vs. SF in BotNS
In-Reply-To: <CAGB0RZ4hrhb0YYSZijWbbhAQJaoNpFxt6R5m08EDtp=Mc=5sNQ at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGB0RZ5cqMvUujjGW+5x2qCrKc8BaEMHyggrNLCsVEVNbgp2xA at mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGB0RZ6Z_0wi+RbqNSjuhBj_iq=v6oRm2KBj_YcXWWz4GEzKLw at mail.gmail.com>
	<1324408368.30211.YahooMailNeo at web114708.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
	<E7E5D56ABC984891B98B625390C9A857@Rover>
	<1324502718.91721.YahooMailNeo at web114714.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
	<CAGB0RZ4hrhb0YYSZijWbbhAQJaoNpFxt6R5m08EDtp=Mc=5sNQ at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4EF322DE.6060701 at gmail.com>

Daniel Petersen wrote (21-12-2011 23:16):
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Jerry Friedman <jerry_friedman at yahoo.com
>  <mailto:jerry_friedman at yahoo.com>> wrote:
>
>
> Daniel Petersen wrote:
>> Ok, Jerry, so I think you, like me, have 'magical' as a subset of
> 'supernatural' or 'paranormal'. But, if not in terms of spells, etc.,
> then in what sense are these phenomena 'magical'? (I think I normally
> think there has to be some human agency in terms of cooperation with
> greater powers through arcane [and usually uncertain] rules or rituals.
> That's the kind of stuff I feel I don't see in BotNS. If the Thecla
> ritual eating is to be thought of this way, then, for once, I'd probably
> tend toward a more 'scientific' explanation as has been discussed.)
>
> To me, goety and theurgy are only one branch of magic.  Another is the
> kind that works by sympathy and contagion, such as sticking pins in dolls
> or keeping one's accidental cut from being infected by cleaning the knife
> that caused it.  Maybe in the same category is the kind that works by
> less obvious correspondences, such as Renaissance alchemy and astrology,
> or indigenous medicine that works by kinships among species that are
> based on stories.  Then there's knowing true names, as on Earthsea.
> Another kind is magical devices, such as the One Ring.  And the kind
> that's just an inherent power, and is or isn't the same as psi.  I don't
> think I can classify all the kinds of magic, but "I know it when I see
> it" (and don't expect everyone to agree).
>
>
> Ah, that's very helpful.  I really need to study what 'magic' might
> encompass.  All these are plausible, but I would not normally have called
>  'inherent power' a magical quality.  That's why I don't think Gandalf is
>  magical in LotR - because he's a 'being with powers', not a 'worker' of
>  magic, someone who goes through certain motions (he may do that as well,
> but it seems to me his 'race' have these sort of inherent powers you
> speak of). Gandalf is more like one of the X-Men to me (or even a 'god'
> or 'titan') than like a traditional warlock or something.  I would put
> both the Neighbours and Inhumi in this category (perhaps *even if* they
> can also be explained more 'scientifically').  All that is connected to
> the Claw in BotNS is NOT magical to me:  rather, it is supernatural and
> miraculous (perhaps prophetic, apocalyptic, and eschatological as well) -
> all rooted in the person, mission, and character of the Conciliator.
> Kind of the opposite of most kinds of magic to me:  more missional than
> manipulative we might say.

In my opinion there's no magic in the 'LotR universe', but I won't enter an
argument over that.

I'll just say that all 'powers' present in it, even those transferred to 
objects, seem to come from Eru and exist by Eru - even if some of their 
wielders are evil, their powers are the same Eru gave them, just misused and 
consequently diminished - cf. Sauron's increasing inability to take an 
appealing shape.

For me, magic is something that breaks the physical laws of the universe it 
exists in. Otherwise, it's just a universe with different laws.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net